ES Link: /projects/cifsm2021/cifsm2021-articulacion-insumo26 -ENLink: /projects/cifsm2021/cifsm2021-articulacion-insumo26-en Link: https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=en&sp=nmt4&tl=fr&u=http://openfsm.net/projects/cifsm2021/cifsm2021-articulacion-insumo26&usg=ALkJrhj2XRZI218kq7LLntvgGu3o2fyGyw -ENLink: https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=en&sp=nmt4&tl=fr&u=http://openfsm.net/projects/cifsm2021/cifsm2021-articulacion-insumo26-en&usg=ALkJrhiYA4ENJyryzLInLD7SkovyENKnCw -FR

Here followsin yellowthe suggestion of modifications in the text of the report of the meeting of September 12 proposed by Rita-

• Comment
• The current consensus / consent in the CI is thatthe WSF is a space(explicitly mentioned @ 17 @ 19 @ 26 @ 27 @ 28 @ 39)
• On the other hand, it is worth mentioning the expressions in the interventions that WSF is subject to the actor, (explicitly @ 23 @ 24 - most implicitly @ 13 group of activists - @ 20 Cetri - @ 23 IPS - @ 24 CSA - @ 26 CF FSMSSS - @ 27 international de la madera @ 31 colectivo @ 40 fundación franz fanon.
• Nowthe main narrative remains that of an WSF as a space tool.Dahi severalreformulationsproposed in the text, cuando have a formulation that implicitly presenta the WSF as "actor forum"
• the initial blotter textis here
• Text 44 below and the “live” rapporteur-
• text 44B is a more “fresh” categorizationof statements related to the WSF in the interventions, based on the text
• The realization of an almost verbatim of the meetinghttp://openfsm.net/projects/ic-extended/online-202009-ampliado1-extensionallows to know who mentioned such an expression or word - these interventions numbered @ 7 to @ 47 are identified in blue below - there may be errors or omissions that anyone can correct based on the transcripts

SUMMARY OF THE MEETING OFDIALOGUE BETWEEN INVITED ORGANIZATIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS MEMBERS OF THE IC- 12/09/2020

• 
  
• The meetingof CI organizationswith a restricted group of movements and international organizations took place on a virtual basis on September 12, 2020, lasting 3 hours. It had an expressive presence of36representatives of organizations and movements from all continents.(17 CI member organizations and 19 invited organizations and movements (16 were on a list of invited organizations and 3 were unforeseen)

• In general, we have had a diverse participation in the regionsand all of themunderstand the importance and the necessity of this dialogue, recognizing the role andpossibilities of the WSF to contribute effectively to the articulation of resistance and transformation gains.
• Some organizations request information on the next stages of dialogue@ 21 NAPM)
• The pandemic challenges us all for putting a check on the capitalist system and highlighting the wide-open inequalities.The pandemic is not a struggle in itself, it is not the cause of everything, but a new crisis that encompasses all others, a crisis of the model, with a chaotic world situation, the gravity of which is due to all the other dimensions of the crisisagainst which have had articulations in the WSF for 20 years.The moment demands positioning and consequent actions.

1) Global solidarity and internationalism

• Everyone understands the importance, the need and the opportunity of this dialogue, recognizing the role and possibilities of the WSF to make a real contribution to the articulation of social struggles and resistance and to transformations.
• Solidarity between the struggles was recurrent in the speeches and results from the need that everyone feels not to act alone, with more articulation, alliances, coordination, joint actions, - words widely used in the debate, among others of a similar sense.In themes cited as global and environmental justice, women, racism and reparations, work and exploitation, extraction, migration, wars and apartheids, financial control, debt, colonialism, pandemic, among others.
• Some speeches pointed out thatparticipation in theWSF should stimulate the debate about a new internationalism.It can help in the emergence of a new social contract, which is inclusive, guided by human and environmental rights and which privileges social protection.@ 33ntui6 @ 42 fsmagh
• This “global social dialogue” must continue and integrate new movements, including youth.In the WSF space, it isnecessary to recognize the existence of new struggles, movements, and also their role,their functions, in the midst of different struggles.Severalproposals point to the need for a new WSF, or a new dynamicwithin the framework of the current WSF.(@ 20 cetri @ 17 caritas)
• It was also suggested to carry out a mapping of the struggles in the world, which face the pandemics of COVID-19 and capitalism@ 18 united

• Expectations point to an unresolved challenge of the strategyto develop theWSFprocessfor political incidence, which deepens in the face of two themes that are also quite common - the advance of the extreme right in the world and the attacks on democracies, which are seriously threatened.
• Political incidence, either as a step to be taken by the WSFconsidered as an actor and with the necessary democratic mechanisms, or as a result of proactive and self-organized use of open space “with added value” by its participants
• The expression “political subject”was also rememberedin several interventions, either as a role to be constructed by the WSF(@ 23 IPS @ 24 CSA), or as a construction by participants who are subject (@ 34 AFM) and through a red of powerful articulations, of a collective political subject that the use of the WSF process, as a tool should better help to build(@ 47 CEAAL)
• The political impact is incompatible with the invisibility of the process.But the solution for the struggles to become visible, - communication - is also political, making it visible involves the ability to form alliances,and also the ability to foster decentralized production and dissemination by participants in the news process since the WSF
  
• (@ 9 IAI @ 12 BNC @ 14 euromarches @ 24 CSA&@ 17 caritas)

3) Support for struggles

• Some expectations(@ 9 IAI)expressed that theWSF should be a motor for mobilization, and not just a place or space for which movements are mobilized.For this, the WSF must present??final lack of phraseIt is not just a matter of movements finding ways to develop and reinforce their struggles through the WSF: the WSF must be a process that is more in line with the struggles, in order to support them.There is a need for moremutualvisibilityof resistance and transformation initiatives,and morehelp / support, solidarity and cooperationbetween them.(@ 17 caritas)
• Specific situations call for global articulations, as in the case of Palestine.This role should be encouraged by the CI. (Who?)In thissense, some interventions(@ 9 IAI)point out that theWSF CI must not only publicize the struggles, but support determined struggles.In the space of the WSFThe expression of solidarity must be transformed into actions.

4) Common strategies and actions

• The articulation must go beyondwhat has been achieved in theWSF it has done so far.Participations in theWSF should help to connect but also to build struggles together, to identify common actions and agendas, to stimulate campaigns ...
• Global and regional strategies need to be deepened. In this sense,an intervention(@ 30 CRID)suggeststhe holding of regional assemblies with the definition of regional strategies,to be evaluated in the CIas a basis for reflections on global strategies. This debate on marketing strategies can also be supported by thematic and regional forums.
• The construction ofarticulationstrategiesto be built at the WSFinvolves the definition of priorities and some actions, but preserving the diversity of movements. (@ 14 euromarches @ 41 franz fanon)In the emergency context caused by the pandemic, it was also suggested to plan a few priority actions (one or two) for execution in a short period of a few months,(by whom?) itwas also suggested to organize a week of global action (perhaps as already done in 2008). (46 @ FMAS

5) CI

• The weaknesses of the International Council need to be addressed.It is necessary to assess its limitations in the process of revitalizing the process, its heavy methodology of meetings, its difficultiesin hosting clear debates about its tasksand making and forwarding decisionsin relation to these.(@ 35 arena)
• An intervention focusing on the responsibility and the possibility of the IC to define and implement in fsm 2021 new formats of participation in the open space oriented to online meetings, the visibility of action initiatives, and to participate-communicating from the WSF to make the WSF a tool most useful for your active participants(@ 17 caritas)
• In the face of limitations to mobilize dynamic forces in various regions.the regionalizationof self-organizedfacilitation and articulationinitiativesand even intervention strategieswas suggested.@30 CRID @ 36 FMAS
• On matters of whose positioning, opinions are not unanimous.For example, do political positions fall to CI or its members?(who spoke of the CI in that?)or to an indefinite WSF@ 23IPS @ 31 centreo mexico)(remembering that the practice of “positions on behalf of CI members and the current consensus / consent)
• CI's practical tasks should include mapping - active movements, struggles and alternatives being built(@ 7 GTA @ 18 arena)and could include the CI website creation(@ 35 arena)
• The composition of the CI was also questioned again. (@ 21 NAPM@ 23 IPS - @ 33 NTUI @ 35 ARENAThe CI should increasingly reflect diversity and involve rules for gender representation.

SUMMARY OF THE CI MEETING WITH SOCIAL MOVEMENTS - 12/09/2020

• The IC meeting with a restricted group of movements and international organizations took place virtually on September 12, 2020, lasting 3 hours.There was an expressive presence ofXrepresentatives of organizations and movements from all continents.
• The pandemic challenges us all for putting a check on the capitalist system and highlighting the wide-open inequalities.The pandemic is not a struggle in itself, it is not the cause of everything, but a new crisis that encompasses all others, a crisis of the model, with a chaotic world situation, the gravity of which is due to all the other dimensions of the crisis against which the WSF has been articulating for 20 years.The moment demands positioning and consequent actions.

1) Global solidarity and internationalism

• Everyone understands the importance, the need and the opportunity of this dialogue, recognizing the role and possibilities of the WSF to make a real contribution to the articulation of social struggles and resistance and to transformations.
• Solidarity between the struggles was recurrent in the speeches and results from the need that everyone feels not to act alone, with more articulation, alliances, coordination, joint actions, - words widely used in the debate, among others of a similar sense.In themes cited as global and environmental justice, women, racism and reparations, work and exploitation, extraction, migration, wars and apartheids, financial control, debt, colonialism, pandemic, among others.
• Some statements pointed out that the WSF should stimulate the debate on a new internationalism.It can help in the emergence of a new social contract, which is inclusive, guided by human and environmental rights and which privileges social protection.
• This “global social dialogue” must continue and integrate new movements, including youth.The WSF needs to recognize the existence of new struggles, movements, and also its role in the midst of different struggles.The proposals point to the need for a new WSF or a new dynamic.
• It was also suggested to carry out a mapping of the struggles in the world, which face the pandemics of COVID-19 and capitalism.

2) Political impact

• Expectations point to an unresolved challenge of the WSF strategy for Political Incidence, which deepens in the face of two also quite common themes - The advance of the extreme right in the world and the attacks on democracies, which are seriously threatened.
• Political incidence, as a step to be taken by the WSF and with the necessary democratic mechanisms, was also remembered by the expression “political subject”, as a role to be built by the WSF.
• The political impact is incompatible with the invisibility of the process.But the solution for struggles to become visible - communication - is also political, making visible involves the ability to form alliances.

3) Support for struggles

• The WSF must be a motor for mobilization, and not just a place or space for which movements are mobilized.For this, the WSF must presentIt is not only about the movements finding ways to develop and reinforce their struggles through the WSF: the WSF must be a process that is more in line with the struggles, in the sense of supporting them.More help / support, solidarity and cooperation are needed.
• Specific situations call for global articulations, as in the case of Palestine.This role should be encouraged by the CI.In this sense, the WSF IC must not only disclose, but support determined struggles.The expression of solidarity must be transformed into actions.

4) Common strategies and actions

• The articulation must go beyond what the WSF has done so far.The WSF should help to connect but also to build struggles together, to identify common actions and agendas, to stimulate campaigns ...
• Global and regional strategies need to be deepened.In this sense, it was suggested to hold regional assemblies with the definition of regional strategies, as a basis for the definition of global strategies.This strategy debate can also be supported by thematic and regional forums.
• The construction of strategies involves the definition of priorities and some actions, but preserving the diversity of movements.In the emergency context caused by the pandemic, it was also suggested to plan a few priority actions (one or two) to be implemented in a short period of a few months.

5) CI

• The weaknesses of the International Council need to be addressed.It is necessary to assess its limitations in the process of revitalizing the process, its heavy methodology of meetings, its difficulties in making and forwarding decisions.
• In the face of limitations to mobilize dynamic forces in various regions.the regionalization of facilitations and articulations, and even intervention strategies, was suggested.

• On positioning issues, opinions are not unanimous.For example, do political positions fall to CI or its members?
• CI's practical tasks should include mapping - active movements, struggles and alternatives being built.
• The composition of the CI was also questioned again.CI should increasingly be a reflection of diversity and involve rules for gender representation.