-
cifuturG2 about dualmembership
institute a “dual membership” inside wsf caring community - to include contributive persons and 2011 generation individual base movement
idea is to accommodate both organizations and individualsthat the organizations can "present" to membership
- 2 representatives per organisation with whatever mandate
- a fixed potential proportion of independent (let us say as many independent as representatives
- an organisation can present 3 person max
- each independent needs to be "presented" formally by minimum 3 organizations ( the presentation is checked by the membership structural goup)
Preeminence of organizations inside wsf caring community
this preeminence could remain in the decision process in plenary meetings – there can be two consensus decision mode
- all CC members are in consensus decision perimeter
- representative only in the consensus perimeter for the decision ( but independent can have up to 50% of verbal interventions in the debate)
and it is the privilege of represetnatives of 5 any organization to ask to switch to "representative only" mode at any time
Dual membership system in "wsf caring community"
item | organisations | representatives of organisation | presented-independent individuals______________ |
| 175 organisations currently many of who are not participating |
|
|
|
internal criteria to choose representatives
one organisaiton can have 2 representatives
one organization can present 3 independents | criteria internal to organisation to choosetheir representatives |
criteria internal to organisation to present independents one independent needs to be publicly presented by 3 member organizations presented independents has no formal link with the organization that present them however if there is a problem with this person’s behavior the presenting organization representative have to mediate withthe person and may ask her to leave the community /IC | |
duration of mandate | unlimited –but ends if no direct ofextended participation in more than two successive meeting( membership structural group review) | flexible according organisation decision | two years maximum |
contribution to event organizing |
| open- as per event organizing dynamics | |
contribution to initiative sustain |
| open- as per initiativeorganizing dynamics | |
contribution to mixed working groups |
|
open / 1 groups minimum
| |
contribution to inner working groups |
|
open / 1 groups minimum
| |
contribution tofunctional groups | an organization must be present in one functional group | open / 1 minimum 2 maximum | |
contribution to structural groups | an organization must be present in one structuralgroup | open / 1 structural grup minimum- following the membership rulescannot be more less 50% of groups - | open / 1 structural grup minimum- following the membership rulescannot be more than 50% of groups - |
criteria for being be pushed out | absence of presence in more than three successive meetings | none- mandatecan be renewed | if all 3 presenting organisaiton ask to go out |
coherence vigilance in groups |
| as group member see that group work is coherent with reference documents and outcome of inner and functional groups | |
participation in group decision process |
| plain participation in consensus mode | |
participation inplenary decision process |
| 5 can ask to switch to representative onlydecision mode | yes or no according to the decision mode chosen in plenary |
quorum rules | 30% of all organisations present in last 4 meeting( extended participation ?) | 60% in the group or mailing list consultation of group | |
xx