-
cifuturG2 about dualmembership
last modified June 18, 2013 by facilitfsm
institute a “dual membership” inside wsf caring community - to include contributive persons and 2011 generation individual base movement
idea is to accommodate both organizations and individuals that the organizations can "present" to membership
- 2 representatives per organisation with whatever mandate
- a fixed potential proportion of independent (let us say as many independent as representatives
- an organisation can present 3 person max
- each independent needs to be "presented" formally by minimum 3 organizations ( the presentation is checked by the membership structural goup)
Preeminence of organizations inside wsf caring community
this preeminence could remain in the decision process in plenary meetings – there can be two consensus decision mode
- all CC members are in consensus decision perimeter
- representative only in the consensus perimeter for the decision ( but independent can have up to 50% of verbal interventions in the debate)
and it is the privilege of represetnatives of 5 any organization to ask to switch to "representative only" mode at any time
Dual membership system in "wsf caring community"
item |
organisations |
representatives of organisation |
presented-independent individuals______________ |
|
175 organisations currently many of who are not participating |
|
|
internal criteria to choose representatives
one organisaiton can have 2 representatives
one organization can present 3 independents |
criteria internal to organisation to choose their representatives |
criteria internal to organisation to present independents one independent needs to be publicly presented by 3 member organizations presented independents has no formal link with the organization that present them however if there is a problem with this person’s behavior the presenting organization representative have to mediate with the person and may ask her to leave the community /IC |
|
duration of mandate |
unlimited –but ends if no direct of extended participation in more than two successive meeting ( membership structural group review) |
flexible according organisation decision |
two years maximum |
contribution to event organizing |
|
open- as per event organizing dynamics |
|
contribution to initiative sustain |
|
open- as per initiative organizing dynamics |
|
contribution to mixed working groups |
|
open / 1 groups minimum
|
|
contribution to inner working groups |
|
open / 1 groups minimum
|
|
contribution to functional groups |
an organization must be present in one functional group |
open / 1 minimum 2 maximum |
|
contribution to structural groups |
an organization must be present in one structural group |
open / 1 structural grup minimum - following the membership rules cannot be more less 50% of groups - |
open / 1 structural grup minimum - following the membership rules cannot be more than 50% of groups - |
criteria for being be pushed out |
absence of presence in more than three successive meetings |
none- mandate can be renewed |
if all 3 presenting organisaiton ask to go out |
coherence vigilance in groups |
|
as group member see that group work is coherent with reference documents and outcome of inner and functional groups |
|
participation in group decision process |
|
plain participation in consensus mode |
|
participation in plenary decision process |
|
5 can ask to switch to representative only decision mode |
yes or no according to the decision mode chosen in plenary |
quorum rules |
30% of all organisations present in last 4 meeting ( extended participation ?) |
60% in the group or mailing list consultation of group |
xx