-
cifuturG2 consultation discussion table2
last modified June 17, 2013 by facilitfsm
CIfutur | cifuturG2 consultation page inputs 1 cifuturG2 consultation discussion table from draft1 to draft 2
This is the correspondence between draft version 2 by Sergio and draft version 3 by Pierre
| proposal V2 by Sergio- We are proposing a consultation process for reforming and relaunching the WSF International Council | proposal V3 by Pierre- this is a concrete proposal WSF IC/CI EXPLORATIONS drafted as "google form" |
| 1/first The consultation process has to be an open space available for all organizations participating and interested in the wsf as a space and a social process | the proposed consultation can be on a public" google form" https://docs.google.com/forms/d/11mFvYyfw1MHciCsxFNB3BkX-5m21w3mhPetM6Hn1meQ/viewform |
| 2/second The consultation process will have an address online to be easily accessible at world level all data document information contributions can be downloaded and shared | the gathered answers can be made available in a spreadsheet format |
| 3/third The consultation process will need a time table aimed to provide the next IC in October the result with concrete proposals | if the basic concept is kept and requires only minor adjustments in G2 group we may be ready by end of june |
| 4/ Consultation space set of documents background | 4/ Consultation space set of documents background |
| 4/a/ list of ic members : name type country n of members ic member since | |
| 4/b/ documents on existing rules of functioning - participation criteria | Before going through this "WSF CI/IC explorations" form below, the reader is advised to read some of the 23 contributions here http://openfsm.net/projects/wsfic_fsmci/wsfic-icfuture-home |
| 4/c/ evaluation documents | |
| 4/d/ reform proposals drafts – | the order of questions has been changed in order to show the equivalence with the V2 questions |
| 5/targets for consultation process - identification | 1 –PREPARATION to WSF IC/CI CONSULTATION |
| 5-1/ Ic members and observers(*?) | A - YOUR OVERALL TIME BUDGET FOR CONSULTATION |
| 5-2/participants at last 3 IC meetings ( tunis - monastir – Dhaka ) | B - YOUR CONTACTS |
| 5-3/organizations registered in the 30 convergence assemblies of tunis | C - YOUR ORGANIZATIONS |
| 5-4/ organizations and individuals interested in the process | D - YOUR SF / WSF IC EXPERIENCE |
| E - YOUR TIME BUDGET FOR WSF IC/CI CONSULTATION | |
| 6/First preliminary questions | 2 - A WSF IC/CI Body to care about WSF process |
| 6-a/Does the wsf process need a permanent body to coordinate and manage yes or no | Q1 - WSF IC/CI BODY SCOPE OF ACTION |
| If NO, please, write HOW and WHO will manage and coordinate the Social Forum process and events. | What is the PERIMETER of WSF PROCESS which a body like WSF IC/CI is considering for its action? select if yes if the item is inside WSF perimeter according to you |
| Answer: TEXT max 200 characters | |
| 6-b/Has the permanent body to be formed as an open assembly or by membership if membership go on | Q5 - TYPE OF BODY |
| □ Open Assembly | What kind of body is best suitable to “CARE ABOUT ” WSF process? select your preferred option (tick one option) |
| □ Membership (if membership go on) | |
| 6-c/ Does the name remain IC yes or no | Q4 - NAME OF WSF IC/CI BODY |
| If NO, please,write your proposal: | What NAME corresponding to its mission and its will of inclusiveness can this body have ? ( select one option ) |
| new topic | Q3 - YOUR VIEW on SECURING A FUTURE for WSF IC/CI |
| what is your feeling at this moment?( select up to two options ) | |
| 7/ questionnaire | 3 –Type of this WSF IC/CI body and Membership/Participation in it |
| 7/1/ IC mandate is service 1 to 5 is political 1 to 5 - propose a verb to express role of this body -
service (box 1) political (box 1) BOX 1 mandate SERVICE: □ General secretariat □ Organization of IC meetings □ information and communication management □ supporting local/regional Committees hosting W/Th SF □ ________________ (others) POLITICAL: (please, detail wich political mandates has to have the IC) □ _______________ □ _______________ □ _______________ |
Q2 - SELF DEFINED FUNCTIONS MISSIONS OF WSF IC/CI BODY
What are the important relevant SELF INSTITUTED MISSIONS of IC/CI according to you.? ( scale : 0 not important - 3 very important ) |
| 7/2/ representativeness - BOX2 one combination from Regional thematic national gender membership fee capacity of mobilization others yes 1 to 5/no | Q6 - WHO CAN BE MEMBERS/INITIATORS/STIMULATORS in this WSF CI/IC (whatever their names)? |
| 7/3/ term mandate 1Y 2Y 3Y ren/no ren | In a closed membership scenario, who can be formal members of WSF CI/IC? ( select one option) |
| 6 – Contributions from members to wsf process and to WSF IC/CI operation | |
| 7/4/membership fees yes no | Q11 - STIMULATING CONTRIBUTION OF WSF IC/CI MEMBERS |
| 7/5/openmeetings yes no | Which can be the stimulating factors for more contributions by WSF IC/CI members to BOTH WSF PROCESS AND INTERNAL OPERATION OF WSF IC/CI? (select ideas you agree with) |
| 7/6/how to make decision consensus majority | 4 –Decisions Making inside WSF IC/CI |
| BECOMES | Q9 - CONSENSUS DECISION MODALITIES |
| How to take decision after discussed inPlenary, if there are different positions ? (do we give options ?) | How are consensus decisions made inside IC/CI ( select one to three consistent options ) |
| 7/7/ Numbers of members 50 100 200 300 | Q7 - SIZE & COMPOSITION of WSF IC/CI Body |
|
|
What are your views about size / composition / membership ceiling? ( select one or two ideas ) |
|
|
Q8 - VOCABULARY ISSUE in a closed membership scenario |
| 7/8/can ic nominate a secretariat yes no | 5 - WSF CI/IC operation and action through Working Groups |
| No (if not, please write hot to deal at operative level: Text max 200 characters) | Q10 - NAME and ROLES OF WORKING GROUPS |
| 7/9/which commissions does iC need | What can be the name and roles for working groups ? Choose one option for each type of group A ( commissions vs functional review ) B ( liaison vs structural) C ( inner groups vs open contributive groups) below. More elements on groups are indicated on the header of part 7 |
| new topic on meetings | 7 - Prepation of Meetings |
| Q12 - TOWARDS WHICH OUTPUTS ARE WSF IC/CI MEETINGS ORGANIZED? | |
| which are the heavy OUTPUTS/GOALS that should determine the topic and time allocation ( agenda) and the form ( plenary / grous ) of WSF IC/CI meetings? ( Give your weight for each : 1 not heavy 3 heavy) | |
| Q13 - GRID "TIME FOR TOPIC" | |
| on the IC/CI meetings, assuming meeting of 3 days totaling 22 hours of main meeting session, what should be, according to you, expressed in hours, the average time allocated to each following topic ? ( select one 1 2 3 4 6 8 hour option,..... and check that you get to a 22 h total ! ) - you can browse a possible typical agenda here : http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-body-meeting-typical-agenda | |
| Q14 "TIME BY SITUATION" GRID | |
| What i s that total time spent in each situation that you would recommend during meetings? (select a 2 4 6 8 h and try to get to a total of 22hours approx as in question 11 above) | |
| Q15 - RELATION WITH NEXT MEETING LOCAL ORGANIZING COMMITTEE | |
| How to give a concretization of co-responsibility between wsf ic/ci members and the local organizing committee |