Choose_survey_by  time & profile

Escoja_encuesta_segun tiempo y perfil

Choisir selon temps et profil

Exploration 1 (16 Q)

PROFILE : developing  wsf  vision ownership and evaluation & scenarios for IC  other facilitation groups

> 15 minutes

Exploration 2A (7 Q)

PROFILE : developing tailoring of IC with proposed adaptations

> 10 minutes

Exploration 2B(10 Q)

PROFILE : developing  WSF  vision ownership – contributions -   IC vision, and recommendations  

> 20 mn  (+ comments)

 Exploration 3  ( 15 Q)

PROFILE : developing IC vision and concrete options for adapting and enhancing IC or dissolving it       

 > 45 mn (+comments)

STATISTICS

       Statistics1 on responses

    Statistics2 on  responses

see_explorations_made

ver las exploraciones ya hechas

voir les explorations deja faites

exploration1_8_responses 

exploration1 espanol

exploration1 français 

exploration2A_28 responses

exploration2a espanol

exploration2Afrançais 

exploration2B_1_responses

exploration3_1_responses  

Color code for question category

Code couleur par catégorie de question

codigo de color por tipo de pregunta

Describing  one’s WSF vision  & ownership  -  decrire sa vision et son rapport au FSM - describiendo vision y relacion con el FSM> lines  3 - 6

personal participation and contributions - participacion personal y contribuciones  > lines 1 2 4 5 18

Tailoring one's vision of  IC scope & organization in general ( ideal)  -  donner sa vision du CI en général ( idéal) - dar su vision del CI en general

> lines 7 to 17

Proposing  concrete actions in IC - proponiendo acciones en ci - actions concretes dans le CI

> lines 24 and (partially) 9 to 17

Giving one's views on evaluation and change scenarios in IC from where IC stands - Donner son evaluation du CI et des scénarions possibles - Dar su evaluacion del CI y de los escenarios posibles > lines19 to 29  (not 24)

from “current IC” to “minimal adapted IC”,  “enhanced adapted IC”   “dissolved IC”  

1

have you participated in ic meetings

1. Have you participated in IC meetings in the past?

Q1 - What is your  experience in WSF process

2

3

Q1- Is WSF process our "common good" ?, and should we, participants in this process, actively care about it ?

Q3 : Select some opinions close to yours regarding WSF process

4

Q4 : What have been/could be your significant contributions to WSF process?

5

Q2 - As wsf participant, do you feel motivated enough to support this WSF process by means that are within your reach?

Q5 : What time and funds would you and your organization POTENTIALLY be ready to contribute to support the process

6

Q3 - As wsf participant, do you feel that WSF world events are a useful "tool" in current context?

7 -  

Q4 - Do you feel that a "central body" servicing/facilitating/impulsing wsf process is a necessity ?

Q6 - type of body  xx-   xx   

8 -  

Q5 – if you answered rather yes in question 4, what are the relevant minimal missions of such a central body ?

Q2.What best would represent according to you the mandate/tasks of the IC? * (choose as many optionsas you preferaccording your vision of what is "ideal" IC)
 e?

Q6 : What is the scope of tasks of IC in supporting / impulsing WSF process?

Q6bis (optional) What is the relevant role IC on each of the 20 wsf faclitation /impulsion tasks proposed  xx-    

Q2 - self defined missions of wsf ic/ci body related to wsf process

9 -  

Q4 - name of wsf ic/ci body –   xx-   x

10  

Q3. 3. What would you consider to best represent the values, attitudes and behaviours of the IC members? (choose as many as you prefer) *

? xx 

Q8 : From a general view point, how do you see “ideal" IC members/participants? xx    

Q11 - stimulating contribution of wsf ic/ci members   xx

11  

Q4. How could the IC tasks be fulfilled? (choose as many as you prefer) ? xx 

Q8 - size & composition of wsf ic/ci body

12  

Q7. How should the IC take its decisions

Q9 - consensus decision modalities   x

13  

Q5. What are your thoughts about the IC membership?xx 

Q6. How could the IC memberships be expanded? ?xx 

Q7 - who can be members/initiators/stimulators in this wsf ci/ic (whatever their names)?   xx 

14  

Q12 - towards which outputs are wsf ic/ci meetings organized?   xx

15  

Q10 - principles and options about organisation - working groups   x 

16

Q13 - "time for topic" table [

Q14 "time for situation" table

17  

Q5 - outwards action of wsf ic/ci entity     x

18

Q7. Assuming your are ic member, Would you be personally willing to commit yourself to the tasks of an ideal IC members:

Q9 : How do you see your possible personal participation in or around IC ?

19 - 

Q6 - What role has played IC in the past 5 years ?

20

Q7 - What is your perception of desire and motivation in IC members and potential members to 22change IC ?

21

Q8 - Is it possible/desirable to create a dynamics inside IC aiming at "delivering" more than IC has been delivering in the last 5 years?

22

Q9 - What are current IC main assets / strengths?

23

Q10 - What are IC main problems / weaknesses?

24

Q11 - In which directions should a change in IC be worked out, if needed?

Q7 : Which recommendation would you support regarding IC for the coming period?

Q15 refining alternatives

25

Q12 - Is there enough “political / methodological “ consensus inside IC to move somewhere, or is IC stalled ?

Q3 - your view on securing a future for wsf ic/ci

26

Q13 - is it possible /relevant that IC dissolves and proposes another frame of facilitation/service for wsf process, without jeopardizing wsf process

27

Q14 - is it possible/useful/wise to keep a "minimal" IC afloat at minimal cost ?

28

Q15 – Is it be possible/relevant/wise to develop other servicing/facilitating/ipulsing groups with different contributive capacity/profile?

29

Q16 - How can a common vision of "what to do ?" be build in and around IC ?

30

Q10 : How about an "exploration 3" , focused on IC missions, IC basic operation, and IC meetings agenda ?

Q16 assessment of this survey