cifuturG2 form input item list (history) - CIfutur (Tunis 4/13 > Casa 12/13)

cifuturG2 form input item list

Comparing		Current Version		by facilitfsm, modified July 1, 2013
to	←	Version 5		by facilitfsm, modified July 1, 2013

Key

inserted
~~deleted~~

CIfutur | cifuturG2 consultation inputs1 5 alternatives in formform item listfirst explorationsfaq about formform overview

......

~~short names for the answers~~ that you will find in the explore reports
~~short names for the answers~~ that you will find in the explore reports
~~short names for the answers~~ that you will find in the explore reports
~~short names for the answers~~ that you will find in the explore reports
~~short names for the answers~~ that you will find in the explore reports
~~short names for the answers~~ that you will find in the explore reports

in this column are the	QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overviewLink: /projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-form-question-overview in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES	WSF CI/IC explorations V3 ACCESS THE REAL FORM HERE with 15 questions >> WSF IC/CI EXPLORATIONS


INTRO		This is a proposal of form made as an input in the discussion on consultation started here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-discussion.
INTRO
INTRO		Before going through this "WSF CI/IC explorations" form below, the reader is advised to read some of the 23 contributions here http://openfsm.net/projects/wsfic_fsmci/wsfic-icfuture-home . This will give elements on the context in which this wsfic/ci consultation is proposed
INTRO
INTRO		The form is a succession of 15 questions covering topics such as : scope , mission, name , actions, type of membership, size, decision process, expected meeting outputs, meeting time allocation, contribution stimulation, type of working groups, next steps
INTRO
INTRO		Many of the optional answers proposed to those 15 questions are reflecting 5 main possible new ways listed below
INTRO		These serve as "mind provokers" when compared to current experience in IC/CI .
INTRO
INTRO		These 5 ideas are summarized in a diagram between existing and possible IC see here: http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-input1-alternatives
INTRO
INTRO		1/ Consider "DUAL MEMBERSHIP", to include "independents" persons ( eg 2011 movement activists) presented by member organisations
INTRO
INTRO		2/ Consider replacing "liaison group" by several "STRUCTURAL GROUPS", each with a limited scope, to spread collective ownership of CI/IC operation among all WSF IC/CI members ( MEMBERSHIP- AGENDA – EVALUATION – RESOURCES – EXTENSION - CONTRIBUTION REVIEW – FOLLOW UP)
INTRO
INTRO		3/ Consider replacing "commissions" by more "FUNCTIONAL REVIEW GROUPS" ( more because several groups are porposed on the communication scope), each focusing on updating a working plan entrusted to contributive groups (see point 5) EXPANSION STRATEGY RESOURCES METHODOLOGY CONTENT ORGANIZERS EXPERIENCE PARTICIPANT EXPERIENCE MEDIA EXPERIENCE NON PARTICIPANTS OUTREACH )
INTRO
INTRO		4/ Consider instituting a public peer to peer "WSF CONTRIBUTION REVIEW among IC/CI members", and give more IC/CI meeting time to value concrete contributive work
INTRO
INTRO		5/ Consider implementig the various functional working plans mentioned in 3/, through "CONTRIBUTION GROUPS", which are open also to sf event organizers and active wsf participants, in order to allow outreach and inmersion of IC/CI in a wider community ( more info http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-possible-working-groups-to-care-about-wsf-process)
INTRO
INTRO		More information about those 5 suggestions http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-inputs1
INTRO
INTRO		So, going through this "WSF CI/IC explorations" form is meant as a moment for exploring existing and possible ways in WSF CI/IC stimulating the reader to imagine further through the different answers proposed .
INTRO
INTRO		IF YOU DO NOT FIND AN ANSWER WHICH IS CLOSE ENOUGH TO YOUR VIEWS SELECT THE LAST ITEM "OTHER ANSWER " and describe your other answer in the comment box
INTRO
INTRO		Each question comes with a "COMMENT BOX" that allows to develop new ideas and comments.
INTRO
INTRO		PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU CAN REEDIT YOUR ANSWERS : after clicking on "submit" at the bottom of the form there comes a web page with an indication of link to reedit - KEEP A COPY OF THIS LINK SOMEWHERE IN ORDER TO REACCESS YOUR ANWERS WHEN YOU WANT
INTRO
INTRO
INTRO		More questions have been prepared to get into more topics such as : relation with non members, legitimacy, role names, criteria for membership in and out, support to meeting participation, funding , expected contributions, characteristics of various types of groups linked to IC/C
INTRO		these questions can be seen in plain text format here ( in the blue areas) http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements
INTRO		Also some information on IC members and participation in past meetings is visible here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-cartography-ci
INTRO
INTRO		una version en espanol del texto del cuestionnario esta aqui http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements-es
INTRO		une version en français du texte du questionnaire est ici :http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements-fr

PRELIMINARY		1 –PRELIMINARY to WSF IC/CI CONSULTATION
PRELIMINARY	NAME
PRELIMINARY	time	This part is for identification and stimulating to some preliminary readings e.g. 23 contributions here http://openfsm.net/projects/wsfic_fsmci/wsfic-icfuture-home . This will give elements on the context in which this wsfic/ci consultation is proposed
PRELIMINARY	A overall time3	A - YOUR OVERALL TIME AVAILABLE FOR CONSULTATION
PRELIMINARY		How much time are you ready to spend on reading a documentation prior to filling the consultation form ? select one answer
PRELIMINARY		r1 - UP to 45 MINUTES – which means going directly to questions
PRELIMINARY		r2 - 1,5 HOUR – which means reading one or two documents ( IC future) http://openfsm.net/projects/wsfic_fsmci/wsfic-icfuture-home
PRELIMINARY		r3 - 3 HOURS - which means exploring several documentations ( IC future and CI future)http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/project-home
PRELIMINARY	B contacts3	B - YOUR CONTACTS
PRELIMINARY		Name Email Skype Telephone
PRELIMINARY
PRELIMINARY
PRELIMINARY	C organizations6	C - YOUR ORGANIZATIONS
PRELIMINARY		1/ Which organization are you linked with ? 2/ please give its node number in Tunis WSF2013.org website (http://www.fsm2013.org/fr/annuaire_organisations - the node number is the one at the end of the url of your organisation page example node of http://fsm2013.org/fr/organisation_info/440 is 440! ) 3/ Are you representing it in this consultation? 4/ Which convergence assemblies of Tunis is it part of, if any ( http://openfsm.net/projects/memotunex/memotunex-assemb) 5/ How many IC/CI meetings have your organizations attended as member ( see data http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-cartography-ci ) 6/ Has your organization attended one of the last three meeting ( Dhaka Monastir Tunis) ( see previous link to check this)
PRELIMINARY
PRELIMINARY
PRELIMINARY	D experience3	D - YOUR SF / WSF IC EXPERIENCE
PRELIMINARY		1/In which big sf event have you been organizer of activities 2/ in which sf event have you been co-organizer of the event itself / 3/ How many IC/CI meetings have you attended ? http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-age-and-presence-in-ic
PRELIMINARY
PRELIMINARY
PRELIMINARY	E consultime2	E - YOUR TIME AVAILABLE FOR WSF IC/CI CONSULTATION
PRELIMINARY		How much time are you a priori ready to spend on filling up the form ? select one answer
PRELIMINARY		45 MINUTES - which means time to read various optional answer on 15 questions and select your answers ( 2mn per question and make some comments)
PRELIMINARY		MORE THAN 45 MN - which gives the possiblity to ponder more questions and suggested answers and to qualify your views with comments

		Part 2 - A WSF IC/CI Body to care about WSF process

in this column are the	QUESTION SHORT NAME that you will alos find in explore reportsLink: /projects/cifutur/cifutug2-formv3-first-explorations and in the the form overviewLink: /projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-form-question-overview in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES	This starting part is focusing on what isWSFprocess and what are the self instituted missions of a "body" called IC/CI, assuming a formal membership process The form of this body is examined in part 3 below . See some input views on wsf process here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-describing-wsf-process , and on IC/CI here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-wsf-process-caring-body-elements
Q1-SCOPE		Q1 - WSF PROCESS AREA and SCOPE OF ACTION WSF IC/CI BODY
Q1-SCOPE		What is according to you the AREA of WSF PROCESS , and the area of action of IC/CI body ?
Q1-SCOPE
Q1-SCOPE	Q1scopewsfevent	WSF EVENT - WSF event preparation, holding, and followup
Q1-SCOPE	Q1scopeallevents	OTHER SF EVENTS preparation holding and follow up - Proposing guidelines and /or support / cooperation to all social forum events processes declaring to be in accordance with charter of principle ( see http://openfsm.net/projects/wsf2012-support/wsf2013-calendar)
Q1-SCOPE	Q1scopeconnections	CONNECTIONS BETWEEN SF EVENTS - Developing ways to help self organized connections between events grow into a tangible notion of WSF process
Q1-SCOPE	Q1scopeactions	SELF ORGANIZED PUBLIC ACTIONS decided and endorsed by wsf participants , i-e beyond ACTIVITIES held in SF events
Q1-SCOPE		1 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish


Q2-MISSIONS		Q2 - SELF DEFINED MISSIONS OF WSF IC/CI BODY related to wsf process
Q2-MISSIONS		What are, according to you, the important relevant SELF INSTITUTED MISSIONS of IC/CI regarding WSF process? ( scale : 0 not important - 3 very important )
Q2-MISSIONS
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionprinciples	PRINCIPLES - Comment and enrich update generic principles and implementation practices for participants and organizers in WSF process
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionvocabulary	VOCABULARY - Propose a vocabulary to describe the WSF process, SF event ,WSF participation, in accordance with general principles
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionorganizers	ORGANIZERS PRACTICE - Help organizers of SF events intercommunicate around good practices
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionparticipants	PARTICIPANTS PRACTICE - Help participants/organisations in WSF process improve /deepen their experience of dialogue and intercommunication in the process through well organized/prepared self organized activities
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionoutputs	WSF WITH OUTPUTS - Help participants value and promote output of their participation in WSF process for their transformative action strategy
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionoutreach	OUTREACH - Help WSF participants communicate what is WSF to their non participants acquaintances
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missiomapping	MAPPING - Stimulate a diversity of “mapping initiatives” about actors, contents, and alternative proposals, produced in activities held inside WSF process
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionmedia	MEDIA - Develop a creative connection with journalists and media In general around SF events and process
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionstrategy	STRATEGY FOR WSF DEVELOPMENT - Review coherence and relevancy of IC/CI collective strategy for WSF process development regarding its political context
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionexpansion	EXPANSION - Expand a horizontal and sustainable WSF process worldwide, attracting contributions and interest from a wide array of actors around IC/CI
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionlegitimacy	LEGITIMACY - Maintain own IC/CI legitimacy through perception of relevancy and efficiency of IC/CI action/contribution in WSF process and in other scale social forum processes
Q2-MISSIONS	Q2missionefficiency	EFFICIENCY - Demonstrate a streamlined and efficient practical operation with high output of connections decisions contributions on WSF process for modest resources spending
		2 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish


Q3-VIEWFUTURE		Q3 - YOUR VIEW on SECURING A FUTURE for WSF IC/CI
Q3-VIEWFUTURE		What is your feeling at this moment?( select up to three options )
Q3-VIEWFUTURE	Q3r1-noprob	r1- NO PROBLEM - things can go as they are
Q3-VIEWFUTURE	Q3r2-help	r2- HELP! – WSF IC/CI cannot go on like this, but I have no clue
Q3-VIEWFUTURE	Q3r3-saviours	r3-SAVIOURS! - let us call for candidates to a NEW MOTIVATED LIAISON GROUP and entrust the problem to them
Q3-VIEWFUTURE	Q3r4-selfreform	r4- SELF REFORM! - an overhaul of vision and organization in this IC/CI body can be made, am willing as IC member to contribute in this overhaul and take some commitment within reasonable limits : 10 days in the year for sustaining the overhaul operation
Q3-VIEWFUTURE	Q3r5-morecontrib	r5- MORE CONTRIBUTIONS! - if they want keep IC/CI running, current members must make a special effort ( fee and time )
Q3-VIEWFUTURE	Q3r6-abandon	r6- ABANDON! - I am ready to invest in creating an alternative to IC/CI, as I see no way forward with IC as it goes
Q3-VIEWFUTURE	Q3r7-OTHER ANSWER	r7 OTHER ANSWER
Q3-VIEWFUTURE		3 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish


Q4-NAME		Q4 - NAME OF WSF IC/CI BODY
Q4-NAME		What NAME corresponding to its mission and its will of inclusiveness can this IC/CI body have ? ( select one option )
Q4-NAME	Q4r1-socmov	r1- CHANGE TO - International council of social movements
Q4-NAME	Q4r2-asis	r2 - KEEP AS IS - WSF international council ( comment : “council" means " counselors” different from " contributors"
Q4-NAME	Q4r3-addprocess	r3 - KEEP & ADD “process” - WSF process international council ( comment: this addition is to stress that the scope is the WSF process as defined in Q1 and not the sole wsf event)
Q4-NAME	Q4r4-community	r4 - REFORMULATE – WSF caring COMMUNITY ( comment: CARING is more than counseling - also the community of those who are caring about WSF process is bigger than IC/CI community, which can be viewed as a “gated community”
Q4-NAME	Q4r5-coregroup	r5 - REFORMULATE - WSF caring CORE GROUP ( comment: "core" means there is a center and there can be a larger community, )
Q4-NAME	Q4r6-initiative	r6 - REFORMULATE - WSF caring INITIATIVE ( comment: "initiative" is a more fuzzy and inclusive word with no clearcut borders)
Q4-NAME	Q4r7-OTHER OPTION	r7 - OTHER ANSWER
Q4-NAME		4 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish


Q5-ACTION		Q5 OUTWARDS ACTION OF WSF IC/CI ENTITY
Q5-ACTION		What can IC/CI be producing / doing in direction of WSF participants to fulfill its missions? ( select various answers that match your views ) - (note : as per existing practice, IC/CI is deemed not in capacity to make declarations outside its WSF facilitation scope)
Q5-ACTION	Q5r1-showflat	r1- SHOW FLAT IC ORGANIZATION TO ILLUSTRATE WSF VALUES
Q5-ACTION	Q5r2-politagree	r2-SHOW POLITICAL AGREEMENT IN IC ABOUT WSF PROCESS : IC is a kind of political club, where big networks that have a critical mass in wsf event, assess and confirm that their participation in WSF event keeps relevant
Q5-ACTION	Q5r3-politviews	r3-REFLECT POLITICAL VIEWS OF IC MEMBERS expressed through their discussion in IC and in activities held in SF events
Q5-ACTION	Q5r4-energyreports	r4-CIRCULATE IC ENERGETIC MEETING REPORTS – the report reflects what is discussed and the decisions made, it is energetic if the meeting is well prepared ( see part 7)
Q5-ACTION	Q5r5-inviteparticip	r5-INVITE WSF PARTICIPANTS TO participate in WSF process in many ways, beyond invitations made by SF events organizing committees
Q5-ACTION	Q5r6-showwsffacilit	r6- SHOW WHAT IS WSF FACILITATION BY IC -CIRCULATE IC INCLUSIVE WSF FACILITATION PLANS - Theses plans are listing scopes, contact, and tasks of OPEN CONTRIBUTIVE WORKING GROUPS that are implementing WSF facilitation actions ( in the area of methodology, contents, expansion, communication between organizers, participants experience, outreach to non participants, resource coordination .etc.)
Q5-ACTION	Q5r7-invitecontrib	r7-INVITE ACTIVE WSF PARTICIPANTS TO JOIN GROUPS CONTRIBUTIVE to WSF FACILITATION
Q5-ACTION	Q5r8-activinname	r8-ORGANIZE ACTIVITIES IN THE NAME OF IC IN SOCIAL FORUM EVENTS these activities are organized in the name of IC and prepared by contributive groups online after consensus in plenary discussion
Q5-ACTION	Q5r9-activselforg	r9-SELF ORGANIZE ACTIVITIES BETWEEN SOME IC MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIAL FORUM EVENTS – these activities are organized by several IC members, through contributive groups or not, in order to stimulate certain debates and linkages identified as important to stimulate between WSF participants
Q5-ACTION	Q5r10-OTHER ANSWER	r10 - OTHER ANSWER
Q5-ACTION		5 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish



		Part 3 –Type of this WSF IC/CI body and Membership/Participation in it

in this column are the	QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overviewLink: /projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-form-question-overview and in the explore reportsLink: /projects/cifutur/cifutug2-formv3-first-explorations in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES	This part focuses on formality and membership See inputs on dual membership here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-about-dualmembership More elaboration on in and out criteria for membership is outside the scope of this exploration but can be seen in the text version : http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements
Q6-TYPE		Q6 - TYPE OF BODY
Q6-TYPE		What kind of body is best suitable to “CARE ABOUT ” WSF process? select your preferred option (tick one option)
Q6-TYPE	Q6r1-noneed	r1- NO NEED FOR A UNIFIED PROCESS. SF events coexist, just by anouncements, and no event claims any more to be "THE" WSF event
Q6-TYPE	Q6r2-informal2Y	r2- INFORMAL GATHERING ONCE IN 2 YEARS - An open meeting every two years at the end of a WSF event is held, just to decide where next WSF will be ( comment : is this realistic ? it would require 2 ,5 years anticipation for the wsf event candidate organizer groups to have a convincing proposal set up - what if no group shows up? )
Q6-TYPE	Q6r3-informal	r3 - INFORMAL - An open self financed assembly meeting several times in between WSF events , WITHOUT formal membership
Q6-TYPE	Q6r4-formal	r4 - FORMAL - A permanent body meeting several times in between WSF events, WITH formal MEMBERSHIP
Q6-TYPE	Q6r5-formal&demanding	r5 - FORMAL & DEMANDING - A permanent body meeting several times in between WSF events, with formal membership and demanding in and out criteria, duties associated to membership
Q6-TYPE	Q6r6-formaldemanding&inclusive	r6 - FORMAL, DEMANDING, & INCLUSIVE - A permanent body meeting several times in between WSF events, with formal membership, demanding in and out criteria, duties associated to membership and INCLUSIVENESS, both to non organization-based movements included as members, and to active WSF participants at large, included as co-contributors with IC/CI members in contributive groups
Q6-TYPE	Q6r7-OTHER OPTION	r7 - OTHER OPTION
Q6-TYPE		if you have chosen one of the first three answers r1 r2 or r3
Q6-TYPE		please explain how the WSF process would evolve in this context
Q6-TYPE
Q6-TYPE
Q6-TYPE		6 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish


Q7-MEMBERS		Q7 - WHO CAN BE MEMBERS/INITIATORS/STIMULATORS in this WSF CI/IC (whatever their names)?
Q7-MEMBERS		In a closed membership scenario, who can be formal members of WSF CI/IC? ( select the various options that match your views)
Q7-MEMBERS	Q7r1-reporgonly	r1- REPRESENTATIVES OF ORGANIZATIONS ONLY– (current situation ) ONLY representatives of organizations are formal members
Q7-MEMBERS	Q7r2-repmandatefix	r2- REPRESENTATIVES of organisations are WITH LIMITED TIME MANDATE (eg one wsf cycle of two years)
Q7-MEMBERS	r3-repmandatebyorg	r3- REPRESENTATIVES of organisations are WITH MANDATE DECIDED BY THEIR ORGANISATION (organizations just have to send to membership group a confirmation of mandate each cycle
Q7-MEMBERS	Q7r4-rep&indep	r4- REPRESENTATIVES & INDEPENDENTS ( "dual membership" scenario) - "independent" individuals who are “presented/proposed” by at least 3 IC/CI members organizations, and are complying with certain in and out criteria, can be formal IC/CI members, and they can be as numerous as the "representatives". They participate in consensus decision process ( see part 4) in plenaries and groups , unless otherwise requested by a minimum of 3 organizations
Q7-MEMBERS	Q7r5-indepmandatefix	r5- INDEPENDENTS presented by organisations are WITH LIMITED TIME MANDATE (eg one wsf cycle of two years) and can be "re-presented" after expiration of mandate
Q7-MEMBERS	Q7r6-transitocontributors	r6-TRANSITION quickly FROM REPRESENTATIVES TO WSF CONTRIBUTORS - Up to now IC is cooptation between organizations - it could become cooptation between persons with acknowledged contributions to wsf facilitation or expansion - inclusion of "independents" being a relevant way to train and test new energies and interests, next to confirmed contributors
Q7-MEMBERS	Q7r7-OTHER ANSWER	r7 - OTHER ANSWER
Q7-MEMBERS		7 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish


Q8-SIZE		Q8 - SIZE & COMPOSITION of WSF IC/CI Body
Q8-SIZE		What are your views about size / composition / membership ceiling? ( select one or two ideas )
Q8-SIZE	Q8r1-50orgs	r1- HAVE A RATHER LOW CEILING AS OF NOW - e.g. 50 ORGANISATIONS - This implies requesting that some organizations "step out", in consideration of dynamics of WSF process, and acting of the organization - Some Organizations can propose “independents” linked to them, as a way to semi-formally keep in the IC/CI certains organizations with a long contributive record and at the same time, leave space for new ones
Q8-SIZE	Q8r2-200orgs	r2- HAVE A HIGH ANNOUNCED CEILING - e.g. 200 organizations and develop ways to handle size in meting ( extension - lower cost of accommodation )
Q8-SIZE	Q8r3-noceiling	r3- CONTINUE WITH NO CEILING - the membership is still manageable without ceiling for a few years after taking out the inactive organizations- let us address this when it becomes necessary
Q8-SIZE	Q8r4-out&outreach	r4- INFORM ABSENT ORGANIZATIONS during next three meetings that they are considered out of IC, AND OUTREACH TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS some data here : http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-cartography-ci
Q8-SIZE	Q8r5-bringindeps	r5- BRING IN INDEPENDENTS during next four meeting
Q8-SIZE	Q8r6-proportion	r6- reach and maintain a certain PROPORTION among members between independents and representatives
Q8-SIZE	Q8r7-balances	r7- MONITOR BALANCES IN IC/CI MEMBERSHIP - care about gender, geographical /continental thematical etc balances
Q8-SIZE	Q8r8-OTHER ANSWER	r8 - OTHER ANSWER
Q8-SIZE		8 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish



		Part 4 –Decision Making process inside WSF IC/CI

in this column are the	QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overviewLink: /projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-form-question-overview and in the explore reportsLink: /projects/cifutur/cifutug2-formv3-first-explorations in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES	The use of consensus decision seems not really questionned in existing discussions. So, this part is focusing on whether, in a dual membership scenarion explored in part 3 above , the "consensus decision capacity " is equally given to all members, or not.
Q9-DECISION		Q9 - CONSENSUS DECISION MODALITIES
Q9-DECISION		How are consensus decisions made inside IC/CI ( select consistent options you agree with)
Q9-DECISION	Q9r1-consensus	r1- DECISION ARE BY CONSENSUS (no one leaves the process if a decision is taken = negative consensus) and decision in any working grup linked to IC can be validated or infirmed by a decision made in plenary
Q9-DECISION	Q9r2-orgonly	r2- DECISION BY ORGANIZATIONS ONLY- Only organization representatives can be part of “negative consensus” explained in r1 above
Q9-DECISION	Q9r3-org&indepif	r3- DECISION BY ORGANIZATIONS & INDEPENDENTS IN GENERAL - Independent members can also be part of negative consensus decision making -However the "organization only" option is activable IN PLENARY if requested by at least 5 organizations
Q9-DECISION	Q9r4-orgonly+ingroups	r4- "decision by organisation only " this option is also possible in GROUPS
Q9-DECISION	Q9r5-decisionall	r5- DECISION BY ORGANIZATIONS AND INDEPENDENTS IN ALL CASES . the "organization only" option explained in r3 above, is not activable
Q9-DECISION	Q9r6-extendedtoo	r6- DECISION BY EXTENDED PARTICIPANTS ALSO - Extended participation of IC/CI members to discussions and decisions in IC/CI is possible ( protocol to be proposed and implemented by a Extension Structural group)
Q9-DECISION	Q9r7-OTHER ASNWER	r7 - OTHER ANSWER
Q9-DECISION		9 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish



		Part 5 - WSF CI/IC Views on operation : Organizing principles, and action through Working Groups

in this column are the	QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overviewLink: /projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-form-question-overview and in the explore reportsLink: /projects/cifutur/cifutug2-formv3-first-explorations in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES	This chapter distinguishes organizing principles and three types of action inside IC/CI P/Organizing principles F/ ORIENTING IC COLLECTIVE EFFORT OF WSF FACILITATION – B/ -ENSURING BASIC OPERATION OF IC G/ -IMPLEMENTING THIS EFFORT WITH GROUPS Existing IC has a certain way of defining and perform those actions. Alternative IC may have another possible way http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-input1-alternatives , and there can be other alternatives ! Working groups are, next to plenary discussion, the vehicle for collective work inside and around WSF IC/CI at time of meeting and online between meetings;
Q10-ORGANIZATION		Q10 - PRINCIPLES AND OPTIONS ABOUT ORGANISATION - WORKING GROUPS
Q10-ORGANIZATION		For each category P F B G : P/Organizing Principles - F/ WSF FACILITATION orientation -B /BASIC operation -G/ WSF facilitation tasks by GROUPS), you can mark your PREFERED OPTION AMONG 3 : “CONTINUE = staying as is", or “CHANGE = explore proposed alternatives” , or “other CHANGE = proposing other alternatives. Working group names and description reflect the organizing options you are taking. More elements on groups are indicated in the part 5 complement questions in the text : http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10P1-concentrate	P1/ CONTINUITY organizing principles : CONCENTRATE TASKS ON 5 to 7 GROUPS with optional participation
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10P2-dispatch	P2/ CHANGE/ organizing principles 1/ DISPATCH WELL DEFINED BASIC OPERATION TASKS and FACILITATION ORIENTATION ACTION to MORE ( around 15 ) GROUPS, INVOLVING ALL IC MEMBERS ( see Q11-R5) AND 2/ DISPATCH FACILITATION TASKS TO CONTRIBUTIVE GROUPS INVOLVING ALL IC MEMBERS, AND MANY NON MEMBERS
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10P3-otherprincip	P3/ other CHANGE/ I propose other organizing principles and describe them in the comment box below
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10F1-facilitby-commissions	F1/ CONTINUITY :FACILITATION PLAN &TASKS ARE PERFORMED BY COMMISSIONS V2 - continue with the practice of functional commission as they are "working" - also covering basic operation issues ( eg: IC/CI membership taken care of by expansion commission)
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10F2-facilitby-Fgroups	F2/CHANGE/ FACILITATION PLAN IS UPDATED BY FUNCTIONAL REVIEW GROUPS / F-GROUPS - Institute permanent functional review groups replacing commissions (with a narrower scope focused on wsf process, and a "50% members renewal" at each meeting – their task is to review progress of a functional work plan based on contribution announcement by IC/CI members and propose launch of contributive groups to implement this plan
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10F3-otherfacilit	F3/other CHANGE I propose OTHER IDEAS FOR ORGANIZING THE FACILITATING WORK OF IC and express them in the comment box
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10B1-basicbyliaisongroup	B1/ CONTINUITY : BASIC IC OPERATION TASKS ARE PERFORMED BY LIAISON GROUP 2- Continue with a central group, "liaising" between functional groups, and not create other "place" where to address basic operation issues of WSF IC/CI
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10B2-basicbySgroups	B2/ CHANGE/ BASIC IC OPERATION TASKS ARE PERFORMED BY STRUCTURAL GROUPS / S-GROUPS Institute these groups to care about the basic protocols for holding the IC/CI community/initiative together (membership- contribution – resource –extension - agenda – evaluation etc) with 50% renewal rule- at each meeting ( replacing and complementing the missions of liaison group)
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10B3-otherbasic	B3/ other CHANGE/ I propose OTHER IDEAS FOR ORGANIZING THE BASIC OPERATION OF IC and express them in the comment box
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10G1-standardworkgroups	G1/ CONTINUITY : TASKS ENTRUSTED TO WORKING GROUPS - continue with groups with IC/CI members only
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10G2-opencontributive	G2/ CHANGE/ TASKS ENTRUSTED TO WSF IC/CI CONTRIBUTIVE GROUPS / C-GROUPS - Decide that tasks, other than functional review and structural group tasks, should be performed between IC/CI meetings by specific contributive working grops, with a generally mixed composition, with up to a large proportion of non IC/CI members in them - -
Q10-ORGANIZATION	Q10G3-othergroups	G3/ other CHANGE / I propose OTHER IDEAS FOR PERFORMING TASKS DECIDED IN IC MEETINGS and express them in the comment box
Q10-ORGANIZATION		10 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish



		Part 6 – Contributions from members to WSF process and to WSF IC/CI operation

	in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES ~~short names for the answers~~ that you will find in the explore reports	WSF IC/CI is a self instituted body claiming to be a facilitator of WSF process, Thus the level of contribution of each of its members to WSF facilitation tasks, and the effective agregation of those contributions in a collective vision and strategy, are a key elements in the analysis of WSF IC/CI relevancy and legitimacy. A contribution review protocol has been sketched http://openfsm.net/projects/wsfic_fsmci/wsfic-icfuturecontribution-3 (- More questions relating to those contributions are available in complements of part 6 here : http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS		Q11 - STIMULATING CONTRIBUTION OF WSF IC/CI MEMBERS
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS		Which can be the stimulating factors for more contributions by WSF IC/CI members to BOTH WSF PROCESS AND INTERNAL OPERATION OF WSF IC/CI? (select ideas you agree with)
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS	Q11r1-noneed	r1- NO NEED TO STIMULATE contributions by IC members in work human resources funds - the contributive capacity of WSF IC/CI membership is enough, based on past ten year record
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS	Q11r2-irrelevant	r2- IT IS IRRELEVANT / ARTIFICIAL TO STIMULATE those "contributions" - the idea of contribution should be not linked to the idea of membership in WSF IC/CI
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS	Q11r3-dualmembership	r3- CHALLENGE EXISTING MEMBERSHIP WITH DUAL MEMBERSHIP - Bring together “representatives” and “independents” to mix and emulate current IC/CI members
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS	Q11r4-memberfee	r4- INSTITUTE A MEMBERSHIP FEE (allowing to fund a significant part of operation of WSF IC/CI) paying the membership fee shows that contributing to WSF process is a key element of member organisation strategy
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS	Q11r5-otherduties	r5- HAVE OTHER DUTIES ASSOCIATED TO MEMBERSHIP like paying membership fees, stimulating crowdfunding, having to be minimally present in one out meeting out of 3, participating in contribution review , and being part on line in at least four groups ( one structural, one functional, and two contributive
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS	Q11r6-contribreview	r6- COLLECT STATEMENTS OF CONTRIBUTIONS to WSF FACILITATION issued by IC MEMBERS, AND VALUE THEM - Institute a public status of “WSF contribution” given by a public peer to peer review of announced contributions among IC members – Discuss the fact that organizations with a low contribution record are advised to leave IC and let more contributive step in
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS	Q11r7-mixedcontribgroups	r7- INCLUDE CI/IC MEMBERS IN A WIDER COMMUNITY - Develop practice of open CONTRIBUTIVE groups where IC/CI members and non members take TOGETHER a WSF process facilitating task. This exposition could be motivating
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS	Q11r8-dispatchbasictasks	r8- DISPATCH BASIC OPERATIVE / STRUCTURAL TASKS TO ALL IC/CI MEMBERS- The collective work inside various structural groups and functional groups, with clear guidelines and rapid renewal, may develop collective ownership and avoid sedimentation of power positions
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS	Q11r9-OTHER ANSWER	r9 - OTHER ANSWER
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS		11 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish



		Part 7 - Preparation of WSF IC/CI Meetings

in this column are the	QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overviewLink: /projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-form-question-overview and in the explore reportsLink: /projects/cifutur/cifutug2-formv3-first-explorations in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES	There is a ten year experience of IC meetings, see 31 meetings held to date http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-cartography-ci . Meetings are the most visible and intense part of the operation of WSF IC/CI - Their quality and output for gathering contributive energies is a key issue. Some ideas on structural groups, on typical meeting agenda , on contributive groups are visible here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-inputs1
Q12-MEETINGGOALS		Q12 - TOWARDS WHICH OUTPUTS ARE WSF IC/CI MEETINGS ORGANIZED?
Q12-MEETINGGOALS		Which are the heavy OUTPUTS/GOALS that should determine the topic and time allocation ( agenda) and the form ( plenary / grous ) of WSF IC/CI meetings? ( Give your weight for each : 1 not heavy 3 heavy)
Q12-MEETINGGOALS
Q12-MEETINGGOALS	Q12goaldebate	NECESSARY POLITICAL DEBATE is HELD - views were exchanged between members about the state of the world and what the WSF process should be –new ideas may emerge
Q12-MEETINGGOALS	Q12goalcontribreview	CONTRIBUTION REVIEW is COMPLETED AND FUNCTIONAL WORKING PLANS are UPDATED – after discussions in functional review groups ( methodology, expansion, resource coordination, contents, organizers experience participants experience, media experience, outreach to non participants), , collective working plans (based on the contribution review content), are entrusted to inner or open contributive groups
Q12-MEETINGGOALS	Q12goaldecisions	INDISPENSABLE DECISIONS TAKEN – in the legitimate scope of IC/CI body – vocabulaly, methodology, location of events & meetings, internal protocols etc
Q12-MEETINGGOALS	Q12goalstrucgroups	STUCTURAL GROUPS are RENEWED and their TASKS are UNDER WAY ( membership, ic resource, evaluation, extension, contribution review, agenda/next meeting, meeting follow up) Quick renewal in those groups is to avoid power positions sedimenting inside some groups and to spreadownership and organizing skills about WSF caring initiative to as many interested members as possible
Q12-MEETINGGOALS	Q12goalprotocols	AGREED OPERATING PROTOCOLS are RESPECTED - ( e.g. protocols for Membership, for Contribution review etc.., implemeneted by structural and functional groups
Q12-MEETINGGOALS	Q12goalcontribgroups	RELEVANT INNER OR OPEN CONTRIBUTIVE WORKING GROUPS STARTED for until next meeting -( they have contributors, scope and online agenda, they may include more participants beyond those present in the IC where they are launched )
Q12-MEETINGGOALS	Q12goalextension	EXTENDED PARTICIPATION POSSIBILITY CONCRETELY GIVEN - both in plenary and working groups ( which can be several in parallel)
Q12-MEETINGGOALS	Q12goalinteractions	FACE TO FACE INTERACTIONS HELD –( informal meetings with fellow contributors on common issues, including progress of contributive groups
Q12-MEETINGGOALS	Q12goalcomment	12 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish


Q13-MEETINGTOPICS		Q13 - "TIME FOR TOPIC" TABLE
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS		During the IC/CI meetings, assuming meeting of 3 days totaling 22 hours of main meeting session, what should be, according to you, expressed in hours, the average time allocated to each following topic ? ( select one 1 2 3 4 6 8 hour option,..... and check that you get to a 22 h total ! ) - you can browse a possible typical agenda here : http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-body-meeting-typical-agenda
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS	Q13topiccontext	CONTEXT - Discussing political context of WSF process
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS	Q13topicwsfevent	WSF EVENT BUILD UP - Discussing the preparation of /mobilization effort of next WSF event shared between IC/CI members and WSF event(s) organizing committee(s)
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS	Q13topicprocess	SF EVENTS AND WSF PROCESS REVIEW - Reviewing and orienting the facilitation effort for the expansion and deepening of the WSF process
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS	Q13topicmethod	VOCABULARY METHODOLOGY PRACTICES - Discussing forms, words, and good practices about WSF event and initiatives
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS	Q13topicbaseop	BASIC IC/CI OPERATION - Discussing and implementing ways of basic operation of IC/CI ( meeting Agenda- membership rules in and out, extension, resources) and protocols for commissions. structural/functional groups
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS	Q13topicclarity	CONTRIBUTIVE TASKS/GROUPS report definition and planning
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS	Q13topictasks	DECISIONS TASKS & ONLINE WORK CLARIFICATION– preparing how to work on line until next meeting
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS	Q13topiccomment	13 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish


Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS		Q14 "TIME FOR SITUATION" TABLE
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS		Plenary and group work are both useful. What is that total time spent in each situation that you would recommend during meetings? (select DURATIONS OF 2 4 6 8 10 hours and try to get to a total of 22 hours approx as in question 11 above) ( see the various types of groups in part 5 Question10 and in the alternative diagram http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-input1-alternatives)
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS	Q14situationplenary	PLENARY DISCUSSION
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS	Q14situationgroupreports	REPORT FROM STRUCTURAL / FUNCTIONNAL REVIEW GROUPS & DISCUSSION IN PLENARY - each structural functional group is given a guaranteed limited time to report in plenary that agenda/next meeting group must respect
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS	Q14situationstrucgroups	STRUCTURAL GROUPS MEETING ON BASIC IC/CI OPERATION (membership – contribution review -etc..)
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS	Q14situationfuncgroups	FUNCTIONAL REVIEW GROUPS MEETING on update of IC/CI WSF facilitation plan based on material collected through contribution review
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS	Q14situationcontrigroups	CONTRIBUTIVE WORKING GROUPS concluding or starting meeting
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS	Q14situationother	OTHERS
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS	Q14situationcomment	14 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish



		Part 8 Futher Inputs and Explorations

	in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES ~~short names for the answers~~ that you will find in the explore reports	You have arrived at the end of this WSF IC/CI exploration - You may have selected the answer SELF REFORM! in question Q3, and declared yourself ready to contribute "around 10 days" in relation with the agenda of G2 G3 groups http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/project-home . This section is about what you could do as of now.
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE		Q15 REFINING ALTERNATIVES
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE		Select the answers that match best your intentions as of now. It may make sense to EXPLORE certain ideas, around discussion of G2 and G3 groups, forming specific self organized groups linked to G2 and bringing outcomes into discussion by next ic meeting
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r1-notmore	r1-i have given my opinions and AM NOT WILLING TO DO MORE at this stage
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r2-contribG2G3	r2 -I intend to actively contribute to the G2 or G3 discussion IN GENERAL TERMS and i will make a written input ( I describe roughly in the comment box below)
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r3-contriblater	r3- I am INTENDING to CONTRIBUTE LATER on some topics mentioned below AS I PREFER TO WAIT for more development in the discussion of G2 and G3 groups ( i describe roughly about what i will contribute in the comment box)
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r4-explmissions	r4 - I am willing to EXPLORE FURTHER THE NOTION OF MISSIONS OF IC (working party) .
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r5-explpolitical	r5 - I am willing to EXPLORE FURTHER THE SCOPE OF POLITICAL DISCUSSIONS AND DECISIONS IN IC (working party) .
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r6-explSgroups	r6 - I am willing to EXPLORE FURTHER THE NOTION OF STRUCTURAL GROUPS (working party) .- Discuss the scopes, terms of reference , protocols for basic operation of those approx 6/7 groups , ( MEMBERSHIP- AGENDA – EVALUATION – RESOURCES – EXTENSION - CONTRIBUTION REVIEW – FOLLOW UP) which are dispatching responsibility for basic operation onto all ic members-
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r7-expldualmemb	r7 - I am willing to EXPLORE FURTHER THE NOTION OF DUAL MEMBERSHIP – (working party) .Review scenarios of changing IC membership from the existing membership- with profiling by continent themes and inclusion of independents from new movements;
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r8-explcontribrev	r8 - I am willing to EXPLORE FURTHER THE NOTIONS OF “WSF FACILITATION CONTRIBUTION REVIEW” among IC members AND of FACILITATION WORKING PLAN UPDATE PROCESS (working party) . How contribution are announced, collected by contribution review structural group, how the various functional review groups, update their facilitation working plan, and launch contributive groups involving all ic members and using the output of contribution review group ,
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r9-explcontribgroups	r9 - I am willing to EXPLORE FURTHER THE NOTION OF OPEN CONTRIBUTING GROUPS (working party) .Generic terms of reference, and review list of scopes and concrete proposals of tasks – sorting them along the various 9 functions ( EXPANSION STRATEGY RESOURCES METHODOLOGY CONTENT ORGANIZERS EXPERIENCE PARTICIPANT EXPERIENCE MEDIA EXPERIENCE NON PARTICIPANTS OUTREACH )
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE	Q15r10-explotheralt	r10 - I am willing to EXPLORE FURTHER OTHER ALTERNATIVES FOR IC that I describe in the comment box.
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE		15 INPUT OTHER IDEAS OR comment your asnwers if you wish
		Comment especially if you have selected r2 r3 or r10



		Q16 Your Evaluation of this Proposed CI/IC Exploration questionnaire

in this column are the QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overviewLink: /projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-form-question-overview and in the explore reportsLink: /projects/cifutur/cifutug2-formv3-first-explorations	in this column are the short names for the answers that you will find in the explore reports	The questionnaire is aiming to bring in several options, as possible answers to a serie of challenges faced by IC , so it is possible to chose among them those reflecting most one's opinion, or even chose not to answer and make one's own answers in the comments. This is section is about collecting your general impression about the questionnaire you just went through,as participants in G2 group http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifutur-consultations
Q16-FORM EVALUATION		Q16 - What is your assessment of this form ?
Q16-FORM EVALUATION		Try to select one answer for each of the 7 topics
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q160a-tedious	0a/ filling out the form has been TEDIOUS
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q160b-interesting	0b/ filling out the form has been INTERESTING
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q160c-tedious&int	0c/ filling out the forum has been BOTH TEDIOUS AND INTERESTING
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q161a-introOK	1a/ INTRODUCTION AND LINKS are informative
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q161b-intoKO	1b/ Introduction and link are unecessary / too long
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q162a-15QuestionsOK	2a/ NUMBER OF QUESTIONS : 15 is ok
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q162b-15questionsKO	2b/ Number of questions : 15 is too much
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q163a-norequireOK	3a/ It is fine that no question have REQUIRED answers
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q163b-norequireKO	3b/ Questions should have required answers
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q164a-issuescoverOK	4a/ MAIN ISSUES are covered by those 15 questions & their proposed answers
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q164B-issuescoverKO	4b/ Some main issues remain uncovered by those 15 questions & their proposed answers ( please explicit which questions in the comment box below)
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q164c-issuesOTHER	4c/ I have suggestions on REPLACING/REWORDING SOME QUESTIONS keeping 15 questions ( I describe them in the comment box)
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q165a-answersclearOK	5a/ ANSWERS PROPOSED to questions are generally clear enough and thought provoking
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q165b-answersclearKO	5b/ Answers proposed to questions are generally confusing
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q165c-answerreword	5c/ I have suggestions on REPLACING/ADDING / REWORDING SOME ANSWERS ( I describe them in the comment box)
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q166a-answersagreeOK	6a/ Most questions had some proposed ANSWERS THAT I COULD AGREE with
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q166b-answeragreeKO	6b/ Several questions have no answers i could agree with and i had to use the comment box
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q167a-concept&formOK	7a/ GENERAL CONCEPT is OK and also the CONTENT and EDITING APPEARANCE too – the form can be WIDELY USED AS IS
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q167b-contentadjust	7b/ General concept is OK, and the CONTENT needs some ADJUSTEMENTS before being used widely ( i describe them in the comment box)
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q167c-editingadjust	7c/ General concept is OK and the EDITING APPEARANCE of the fom needs some ADJUSTMENTS before being used widely ( i describe them in the comment box)
Q16-FORM EVALUATION	Q167d-conceptChange	7d/ General concept has to be SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGED and i have suggestions ( i describe them in the comment box)
Q16-FORM EVALUATION		16 your comments
		Please give YOUR COMMENTS, and /or explicit YOUR SUGGESTIONS announced above in items 4 5 6 7 - In the case of item 4 5 or 6 precise the Questions Q1 to Q15 or their answers that you refer to

CIfutur (Tunis 4/13 > Casa 12/13)

OpenFSM

cifuturG2 form input item list

Current Version

Version 5

Key

WSF CI/IC explorations V3

ACCESS THE REAL FORM HERE with 15 questions >> WSF IC/CI EXPLORATIONS

1 –PRELIMINARY to WSF IC/CI CONSULTATION

Part 2 - A WSF IC/CI Body to care about WSF process

Part 3 –Type of this WSF IC/CI body and Membership/Participation in it

Part 4 –Decision Making process inside WSF IC/CI

Part 5 - WSF CI/IC Views on operation : Organizing principles, and action through Working Groups

Part 6 – Contributions from members to WSF process and to WSF IC/CI operation

Part 7 - Preparation of WSF IC/CI Meetings

Part 8 Futher Inputs and Explorations

Q16 Your Evaluation of this Proposed CI/IC Exploration questionnaire