-
cifuturG2 form input item list
last modified July 1, 2013 by facilitfsm
CIfutur | cifuturG2 consultation inputs1 5 alternatives in form form item list first explorations faq about form form overview
......
in this column are the QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overview
|
in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES that you will find in the explore reports
|
WSF CI/IC explorations V3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRO |
|
This is a proposal of form made as an input in the discussion on consultation started here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-discussion. |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
Before going through this "WSF CI/IC explorations" form below, the reader is advised to read some of the 23 contributions here http://openfsm.net/projects/wsfic_fsmci/wsfic-icfuture-home . This will give elements on the context in which this wsfic/ci consultation is proposed |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
The form is a succession of 15 questions covering topics such as : scope , mission, name , actions, type of membership, size, decision process, expected meeting outputs, meeting time allocation, contribution stimulation, type of working groups, next steps |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
Many of the optional answers proposed to those 15 questions are reflecting 5 main possible new ways listed below |
INTRO |
|
These serve as "mind provokers" when compared to current experience in IC/CI . |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
These 5 ideas are summarized in a diagram between existing and possible IC see here: http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-input1-alternatives |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
1/ Consider "DUAL MEMBERSHIP", to include "independents" persons ( eg 2011 movement activists) presented by member organisations |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
2/ Consider replacing "liaison group" by several "STRUCTURAL GROUPS", each with a limited scope, to spread collective ownership of CI/IC operation among all WSF IC/CI members ( MEMBERSHIP- AGENDA – EVALUATION – RESOURCES – EXTENSION - CONTRIBUTION REVIEW – FOLLOW UP) |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
3/ Consider replacing "commissions" by more "FUNCTIONAL REVIEW GROUPS" ( more because several groups are porposed on the communication scope), each focusing on updating a working plan entrusted to contributive groups (see point 5) EXPANSION STRATEGY RESOURCES METHODOLOGY CONTENT ORGANIZERS EXPERIENCE PARTICIPANT EXPERIENCE MEDIA EXPERIENCE NON PARTICIPANTS OUTREACH ) |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
4/ Consider instituting a public peer to peer "WSF CONTRIBUTION REVIEW among IC/CI members", and give more IC/CI meeting time to value concrete contributive work |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
5/ Consider implementig the various functional working plans mentioned in 3/, through "CONTRIBUTION GROUPS", which are open also to sf event organizers and active wsf participants, in order to allow outreach and inmersion of IC/CI in a wider community ( more info http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-possible-working-groups-to-care-about-wsf-process) |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
More information about those 5 suggestions http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-inputs1 |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
So, going through this "WSF CI/IC explorations" form is meant as a moment for exploring existing and possible ways in WSF CI/IC stimulating the reader to imagine further through the different answers proposed . |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
IF YOU DO NOT FIND AN ANSWER WHICH IS CLOSE ENOUGH TO YOUR VIEWS SELECT THE LAST ITEM "OTHER ANSWER " and describe your other answer in the comment box |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
Each question comes with a "COMMENT BOX" that allows to develop new ideas and comments. |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU CAN REEDIT YOUR ANSWERS : after clicking on "submit" at the bottom of the form there comes a web page with an indication of link to reedit - KEEP A COPY OF THIS LINK SOMEWHERE IN ORDER TO REACCESS YOUR ANWERS WHEN YOU WANT |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
More questions have been prepared to get into more topics such as : relation with non members, legitimacy, role names, criteria for membership in and out, support to meeting participation, funding , expected contributions, characteristics of various types of groups linked to IC/C |
INTRO |
|
these questions can be seen in plain text format here ( in the blue areas) http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements |
INTRO |
|
Also some information on IC members and participation in past meetings is visible here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-cartography-ci |
INTRO |
|
|
INTRO |
|
una version en espanol del texto del cuestionnario esta aqui http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements-es |
INTRO |
|
une version en français du texte du questionnaire est ici :http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements-fr |
|
|
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
1 –PRELIMINARY to WSF IC/CI CONSULTATION |
PRELIMINARY | NAME |
|
PRELIMINARY | time | This part is for identification and stimulating to some preliminary readings e.g. 23 contributions here http://openfsm.net/projects/wsfic_fsmci/wsfic-icfuture-home . This will give elements on the context in which this wsfic/ci consultation is proposed |
PRELIMINARY | A overall time3 |
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
How much time are you ready to spend on reading a documentation prior to filling the consultation form ? select one answer
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY | B contacts3 |
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
Name Email Skype Telephone
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY | C organizations6 |
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
1/ Which organization are you linked with ? 2/ please give its node number in Tunis WSF2013.org website (http://www.fsm2013.org/fr/annuaire_organisations - the node number is the one at the end of the url of your organisation page example node of http://fsm2013.org/fr/organisation_info/440 is 440! ) 3/ Are you representing it in this consultation? 4/ Which convergence assemblies of Tunis is it part of, if any ( http://openfsm.net/projects/memotunex/memotunex-assemb) 5/ How many IC/CI meetings have your organizations attended as member ( see data http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-cartography-ci ) 6/ Has your organization attended one of the last three meeting ( Dhaka Monastir Tunis) ( see previous link to check this)
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY | D experience3 |
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY | E consultime2 |
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
How much time are you a priori ready to spend on filling up the form ? select one answer
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
PRELIMINARY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2 - A WSF IC/CI Body to care about WSF process |
|
|
|
in this column are the QUESTION SHORT NAME that you will alos find in explore reports and in the the form overview
|
in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES that you will find in the explore reports
|
This starting part is focusing on what isWSFprocess and what are the self instituted missions of a "body" called IC/CI, assuming a formal membership process The form of this body is examined in part 3 below . See some input views on wsf process here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-describing-wsf-process , and on IC/CI here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-wsf-process-caring-body-elements |
Q1-SCOPE |
|
|
Q1-SCOPE |
|
What is according to you the AREA of WSF PROCESS , and the area of action of IC/CI body ?
|
Q1-SCOPE |
|
|
Q1-SCOPE | Q1scopewsfevent | WSF EVENT - WSF event preparation, holding, and followup |
Q1-SCOPE | Q1scopeallevents | OTHER SF EVENTS preparation holding and follow up - Proposing guidelines and /or support / cooperation to all social forum events processes declaring to be in accordance with charter of principle ( see http://openfsm.net/projects/wsf2012-support/wsf2013-calendar) |
Q1-SCOPE | Q1scopeconnections | CONNECTIONS BETWEEN SF EVENTS - Developing ways to help self organized connections between events grow into a tangible notion of WSF process |
Q1-SCOPE | Q1scopeactions | SELF ORGANIZED PUBLIC ACTIONS decided and endorsed by wsf participants , i-e beyond ACTIVITIES held in SF events |
Q1-SCOPE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2-MISSIONS |
|
|
Q2-MISSIONS |
|
What are, according to you, the important relevant SELF INSTITUTED MISSIONS of IC/CI regarding WSF process? ( scale : 0 not important - 3 very important )
|
Q2-MISSIONS |
|
|
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionprinciples | PRINCIPLES - Comment and enrich update generic principles and implementation practices for participants and organizers in WSF process |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionvocabulary | VOCABULARY - Propose a vocabulary to describe the WSF process, SF event ,WSF participation, in accordance with general principles |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionorganizers | ORGANIZERS PRACTICE - Help organizers of SF events intercommunicate around good practices |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionparticipants | PARTICIPANTS PRACTICE - Help participants/organisations in WSF process improve /deepen their experience of dialogue and intercommunication in the process through well organized/prepared self organized activities |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionoutputs | WSF WITH OUTPUTS - Help participants value and promote output of their participation in WSF process for their transformative action strategy |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionoutreach | OUTREACH - Help WSF participants communicate what is WSF to their non participants acquaintances |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missiomapping | MAPPING - Stimulate a diversity of “mapping initiatives” about actors, contents, and alternative proposals, produced in activities held inside WSF process |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionmedia | MEDIA - Develop a creative connection with journalists and media In general around SF events and process |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionstrategy | STRATEGY FOR WSF DEVELOPMENT - Review coherence and relevancy of IC/CI collective strategy for WSF process development regarding its political context |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionexpansion | EXPANSION - Expand a horizontal and sustainable WSF process worldwide, attracting contributions and interest from a wide array of actors around IC/CI |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionlegitimacy | LEGITIMACY - Maintain own IC/CI legitimacy through perception of relevancy and efficiency of IC/CI action/contribution in WSF process and in other scale social forum processes |
Q2-MISSIONS | Q2missionefficiency | EFFICIENCY - Demonstrate a streamlined and efficient practical operation with high output of connections decisions contributions on WSF process for modest resources spending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q3-VIEWFUTURE |
|
|
Q3-VIEWFUTURE |
|
What is your feeling at this moment?( select up to three options )
|
Q3-VIEWFUTURE | Q3r1-noprob | |
Q3-VIEWFUTURE | Q3r2-help | |
Q3-VIEWFUTURE | Q3r3-saviours | |
Q3-VIEWFUTURE | Q3r4-selfreform | |
Q3-VIEWFUTURE | Q3r5-morecontrib | |
Q3-VIEWFUTURE | Q3r6-abandon | |
Q3-VIEWFUTURE | Q3r7-OTHER ANSWER | |
Q3-VIEWFUTURE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4-NAME |
|
|
Q4-NAME |
|
What NAME corresponding to its mission and its will of inclusiveness can this IC/CI body have ? ( select one option )
|
Q4-NAME | Q4r1-socmov | |
Q4-NAME | Q4r2-asis | |
Q4-NAME | Q4r3-addprocess | |
Q4-NAME | Q4r4-community | |
Q4-NAME | Q4r5-coregroup | |
Q4-NAME | Q4r6-initiative | |
Q4-NAME | Q4r7-OTHER OPTION | |
Q4-NAME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q5-ACTION |
|
|
Q5-ACTION |
|
What can IC/CI be producing / doing in direction of WSF participants to fulfill its missions? ( select various answers that match your views ) - (note : as per existing practice, IC/CI is deemed not in capacity to make declarations outside its WSF facilitation scope)
|
Q5-ACTION | Q5r1-showflat | |
Q5-ACTION | Q5r2-politagree | |
Q5-ACTION | Q5r3-politviews | |
Q5-ACTION | Q5r4-energyreports | |
Q5-ACTION | Q5r5-inviteparticip | |
Q5-ACTION | Q5r6-showwsffacilit | |
Q5-ACTION | Q5r7-invitecontrib | |
Q5-ACTION | Q5r8-activinname | |
Q5-ACTION | Q5r9-activselforg | |
Q5-ACTION | Q5r10-OTHER ANSWER | |
Q5-ACTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 3 –Type of this WSF IC/CI body and Membership/Participation in it |
|
|
|
in this column are the QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overview and in the explore reports
|
in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES that you will find in the explore reports
|
This part focuses on formality and membership See inputs on dual membership here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-about-dualmembership More elaboration on in and out criteria for membership is outside the scope of this exploration but can be seen in the text version : http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements |
Q6-TYPE |
|
|
Q6-TYPE |
|
What kind of body is best suitable to “CARE ABOUT ” WSF process? select your preferred option (tick one option)
|
Q6-TYPE | Q6r1-noneed | |
Q6-TYPE | Q6r2-informal2Y | |
Q6-TYPE | Q6r3-informal | |
Q6-TYPE | Q6r4-formal | |
Q6-TYPE | Q6r5-formal&demanding | |
Q6-TYPE | Q6r6-formaldemanding&inclusive | |
Q6-TYPE | Q6r7-OTHER OPTION | |
Q6-TYPE |
|
|
Q6-TYPE |
|
please explain how the WSF process would evolve in this context
|
Q6-TYPE |
|
|
Q6-TYPE |
|
|
Q6-TYPE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q7-MEMBERS |
|
|
Q7-MEMBERS |
|
In a closed membership scenario, who can be formal members of WSF CI/IC? ( select the various options that match your views)
|
Q7-MEMBERS | Q7r1-reporgonly | |
Q7-MEMBERS | Q7r2-repmandatefix | |
Q7-MEMBERS | r3-repmandatebyorg | |
Q7-MEMBERS | Q7r4-rep&indep | |
Q7-MEMBERS | Q7r5-indepmandatefix | |
Q7-MEMBERS | Q7r6-transitocontributors | |
Q7-MEMBERS | Q7r7-OTHER ANSWER | |
Q7-MEMBERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q8-SIZE |
|
|
Q8-SIZE |
|
What are your views about size / composition / membership ceiling? ( select one or two ideas )
|
Q8-SIZE | Q8r1-50orgs | |
Q8-SIZE | Q8r2-200orgs | |
Q8-SIZE | Q8r3-noceiling | |
Q8-SIZE | Q8r4-out&outreach | |
Q8-SIZE | Q8r5-bringindeps | |
Q8-SIZE | Q8r6-proportion | |
Q8-SIZE | Q8r7-balances | |
Q8-SIZE | Q8r8-OTHER ANSWER | |
Q8-SIZE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 4 –Decision Making process inside WSF IC/CI |
|
|
|
in this column are the QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overview and in the explore reports
|
in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES that you will find in the explore reports
|
The use of consensus decision seems not really questionned in existing discussions. So, this part is focusing on whether, in a dual membership scenarion explored in part 3 above , the "consensus decision capacity " is equally given to all members, or not. |
Q9-DECISION |
|
|
Q9-DECISION |
|
How are consensus decisions made inside IC/CI ( select consistent options you agree with)
|
Q9-DECISION | Q9r1-consensus | |
Q9-DECISION | Q9r2-orgonly | |
Q9-DECISION | Q9r3-org&indepif | |
Q9-DECISION | Q9r4-orgonly+ingroups | |
Q9-DECISION | Q9r5-decisionall | |
Q9-DECISION | Q9r6-extendedtoo | |
Q9-DECISION | Q9r7-OTHER ASNWER | |
Q9-DECISION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 5 - WSF CI/IC Views on operation : Organizing principles, and action through Working Groups |
|
|
|
in this column are the QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overview and in the explore reports
|
in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES that you will find in the explore reports
|
This chapter distinguishes organizing principles and three types of action inside IC/CI P/Organizing principles F/ ORIENTING IC COLLECTIVE EFFORT OF WSF FACILITATION – B/ -ENSURING BASIC OPERATION OF IC G/ -IMPLEMENTING THIS EFFORT WITH GROUPS Existing IC has a certain way of defining and perform those actions. Alternative IC may have another possible way http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-input1-alternatives , and there can be other alternatives ! Working groups are, next to plenary discussion, the vehicle for collective work inside and around WSF IC/CI at time of meeting and online between meetings; |
Q10-ORGANIZATION |
|
|
Q10-ORGANIZATION |
|
For each category P F B G : P/Organizing Principles - F/ WSF FACILITATION orientation -B /BASIC operation -G/ WSF facilitation tasks by GROUPS), you can mark your PREFERED OPTION AMONG 3 : “CONTINUE = staying as is", or “CHANGE = explore proposed alternatives” , or “other CHANGE = proposing other alternatives. Working group names and description reflect the organizing options you are taking. More elements on groups are indicated in the part 5 complement questions in the text : http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10P1-concentrate | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10P2-dispatch | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10P3-otherprincip | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10F1-facilitby-commissions | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10F2-facilitby-Fgroups | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10F3-otherfacilit | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10B1-basicbyliaisongroup | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10B2-basicbySgroups | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10B3-otherbasic | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10G1-standardworkgroups | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10G2-opencontributive | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION | Q10G3-othergroups | |
Q10-ORGANIZATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 6 – Contributions from members to WSF process and to WSF IC/CI operation |
|
|
|
|
in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES that you will find in the explore reports
|
WSF IC/CI is a self instituted body claiming to be a facilitator of WSF process, Thus the level of contribution of each of its members to WSF facilitation tasks, and the effective agregation of those contributions in a collective vision and strategy, are a key elements in the analysis of WSF IC/CI relevancy and legitimacy. A contribution review protocol has been sketched http://openfsm.net/projects/wsfic_fsmci/wsfic-icfuturecontribution-3 (- More questions relating to those contributions are available in complements of part 6 here : http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS |
|
|
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS |
|
Which can be the stimulating factors for more contributions by WSF IC/CI members to BOTH WSF PROCESS AND INTERNAL OPERATION OF WSF IC/CI? (select ideas you agree with)
|
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS | Q11r1-noneed | |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS | Q11r2-irrelevant | |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS | Q11r3-dualmembership | |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS | Q11r4-memberfee | |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS | Q11r5-otherduties | |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS | Q11r6-contribreview | |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS | Q11r7-mixedcontribgroups | |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS | Q11r8-dispatchbasictasks | |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS | Q11r9-OTHER ANSWER | |
Q11-CONTRIBUTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 7 - Preparation of WSF IC/CI Meetings |
|
|
|
in this column are the QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overview and in the explore reports
|
in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES that you will find in the explore reports
|
There is a ten year experience of IC meetings, see 31 meetings held to date http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-cartography-ci . Meetings are the most visible and intense part of the operation of WSF IC/CI - Their quality and output for gathering contributive energies is a key issue. Some ideas on structural groups, on typical meeting agenda , on contributive groups are visible here http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-consultation-inputs1 |
Q12-MEETINGGOALS |
|
|
Q12-MEETINGGOALS |
|
Which are the heavy OUTPUTS/GOALS that should determine the topic and time allocation ( agenda) and the form ( plenary / grous ) of WSF IC/CI meetings? ( Give your weight for each : 1 not heavy 3 heavy)
|
Q12-MEETINGGOALS |
|
|
Q12-MEETINGGOALS | Q12goaldebate | NECESSARY POLITICAL DEBATE is HELD - views were exchanged between members about the state of the world and what the WSF process should be –new ideas may emerge |
Q12-MEETINGGOALS | Q12goalcontribreview | CONTRIBUTION REVIEW is COMPLETED AND FUNCTIONAL WORKING PLANS are UPDATED – after discussions in functional review groups ( methodology, expansion, resource coordination, contents, organizers experience participants experience, media experience, outreach to non participants), , collective working plans (based on the contribution review content), are entrusted to inner or open contributive groups |
Q12-MEETINGGOALS | Q12goaldecisions | INDISPENSABLE DECISIONS TAKEN – in the legitimate scope of IC/CI body – vocabulaly, methodology, location of events & meetings, internal protocols etc |
Q12-MEETINGGOALS | Q12goalstrucgroups | STUCTURAL GROUPS are RENEWED and their TASKS are UNDER WAY ( membership, ic resource, evaluation, extension, contribution review, agenda/next meeting, meeting follow up) Quick renewal in those groups is to avoid power positions sedimenting inside some groups and to spreadownership and organizing skills about WSF caring initiative to as many interested members as possible |
Q12-MEETINGGOALS | Q12goalprotocols | AGREED OPERATING PROTOCOLS are RESPECTED - ( e.g. protocols for Membership, for Contribution review etc.., implemeneted by structural and functional groups |
Q12-MEETINGGOALS | Q12goalcontribgroups | RELEVANT INNER OR OPEN CONTRIBUTIVE WORKING GROUPS STARTED for until next meeting -( they have contributors, scope and online agenda, they may include more participants beyond those present in the IC where they are launched ) |
Q12-MEETINGGOALS | Q12goalextension | EXTENDED PARTICIPATION POSSIBILITY CONCRETELY GIVEN - both in plenary and working groups ( which can be several in parallel) |
Q12-MEETINGGOALS | Q12goalinteractions | FACE TO FACE INTERACTIONS HELD –( informal meetings with fellow contributors on common issues, including progress of contributive groups |
Q12-MEETINGGOALS | Q12goalcomment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS |
|
|
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS |
|
|
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS |
|
|
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS | Q13topiccontext | CONTEXT - Discussing political context of WSF process |
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS | Q13topicwsfevent | WSF EVENT BUILD UP - Discussing the preparation of /mobilization effort of next WSF event shared between IC/CI members and WSF event(s) organizing committee(s) |
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS | Q13topicprocess | SF EVENTS AND WSF PROCESS REVIEW - Reviewing and orienting the facilitation effort for the expansion and deepening of the WSF process |
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS | Q13topicmethod | VOCABULARY METHODOLOGY PRACTICES - Discussing forms, words, and good practices about WSF event and initiatives |
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS | Q13topicbaseop | BASIC IC/CI OPERATION - Discussing and implementing ways of basic operation of IC/CI ( meeting Agenda- membership rules in and out, extension, resources) and protocols for commissions. structural/functional groups |
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS | Q13topicclarity | CONTRIBUTIVE TASKS/GROUPS report definition and planning |
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS | Q13topictasks | DECISIONS TASKS & ONLINE WORK CLARIFICATION– preparing how to work on line until next meeting |
Q13-MEETINGTOPICS | Q13topiccomment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS |
|
|
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS |
|
|
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS |
|
|
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS | Q14situationplenary | PLENARY DISCUSSION |
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS | Q14situationgroupreports | REPORT FROM STRUCTURAL / FUNCTIONNAL REVIEW GROUPS & DISCUSSION IN PLENARY - each structural functional group is given a guaranteed limited time to report in plenary that agenda/next meeting group must respect |
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS | Q14situationstrucgroups | STRUCTURAL GROUPS MEETING ON BASIC IC/CI OPERATION (membership – contribution review -etc..) |
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS | Q14situationfuncgroups | FUNCTIONAL REVIEW GROUPS MEETING on update of IC/CI WSF facilitation plan based on material collected through contribution review |
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS | Q14situationcontrigroups | CONTRIBUTIVE WORKING GROUPS concluding or starting meeting |
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS | Q14situationother | OTHERS |
Q14-MEETINGSITUATIONS | Q14situationcomment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 8 Futher Inputs and Explorations |
|
|
|
|
in this column are the ANSWER SHORT NAMES that you will find in the explore reports
|
You have arrived at the end of this WSF IC/CI exploration - You may have selected the answer SELF REFORM! in question Q3, and declared yourself ready to contribute "around 10 days" in relation with the agenda of G2 G3 groups http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/project-home . This section is about what you could do as of now. |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE |
|
|
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE |
|
Select the answers that match best your intentions as of now. It may make sense to EXPLORE certain ideas, around discussion of G2 and G3 groups, forming specific self organized groups linked to G2 and bringing outcomes into discussion by next ic meeting
|
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r1-notmore | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r2-contribG2G3 | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r3-contriblater | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r4-explmissions | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r5-explpolitical | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r6-explSgroups | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r7-expldualmemb | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r8-explcontribrev | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r9-explcontribgroups | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE | Q15r10-explotheralt | |
Q15-DISCUSS&EXPLORE |
|
|
|
|
Comment especially if you have selected r2 r3 or r10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q16 Your Evaluation of this Proposed CI/IC Exploration questionnaire |
|
|
|
in this column are the QUESTION TOPIC that you will find in the form overview and in the explore reports | in this column are the short names for the answers that you will find in the explore reports
|
The questionnaire is aiming to bring in several options, as possible answers to a serie of challenges faced by IC , so it is possible to chose among them those reflecting most one's opinion, or even chose not to answer and make one's own answers in the comments. This is section is about collecting your general impression about the questionnaire you just went through,as participants in G2 group http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifutur-consultations |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION |
|
|
Q16-FORM EVALUATION |
|
Try to select one answer for each of the 7 topics
|
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q160a-tedious | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q160b-interesting | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q160c-tedious&int | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q161a-introOK | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q161b-intoKO | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q162a-15QuestionsOK | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q162b-15questionsKO | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q163a-norequireOK | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q163b-norequireKO | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q164a-issuescoverOK | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q164B-issuescoverKO | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q164c-issuesOTHER | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q165a-answersclearOK | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q165b-answersclearKO | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q165c-answerreword | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q166a-answersagreeOK | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q166b-answeragreeKO | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q167a-concept&formOK | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q167b-contentadjust | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q167c-editingadjust | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION | Q167d-conceptChange | |
Q16-FORM EVALUATION |
|
|
|
|
Please give YOUR COMMENTS, and /or explicit YOUR SUGGESTIONS announced above in items 4 5 6 7 - In the case of item 4 5 or 6 precise the Questions Q1 to Q15 or their answers that you refer to
|
xx