• cifuturG2 input1 alternatives

Comparing

Current Version

by facilitfsm, modified September 3, 2013
to

Version 5

by facilitfsm, modified July 2, 2013

Key

  • inserted
  • deleted

This page is showing 5 possible CHANGES that are used as "mind provokers" in the exploration 3 questionnaire

Leftis a diagram about existing IC with double aspect

  • basic internal operation ( blue area) withliaison group /wsf office ) and working groups ( such as G1 G2 G3)
  • support of wsf process area ( pink area) with- commissions) with working groups

Right is a diagram about possible IC with same double aspects, where certain CHANGES from left diagram are proposed to adress challenges > Challenges

  • CHANGE 1 :dual membership including independents presented by organisations- > Dualmembership
  • CHANGE 2 : (blue area) structural groups replacing liaison group and some commissions and clearly separated from funcionnal groups >structural /functionnal groups ( IC MEMBERSHIP- IC MEETING AGENDA – IC EVALUATION – IC MEETING RESOURCES – IC MEETING EXTENSION - IC WSF CONTRIBUTION REVIEW – IC MEETING FOLLOW UP)
  • CHANGE 3 :(pink area) functional review groupsreplacing commissions (communication commission is split into more groups ) and focused on updating a workplan , involving the contributive groups (EXPANSION STRATEGY RESOURCES METHODOLOGY CONTENT and ORGANIZERS EXPERIENCE PARTICIPANT EXPERIENCE MEDIA EXPERIENCE NON PARTICIPANTS OUTREACH )
  • CHANGE 4: a mutual wsf contribution review is performed in each ic meeting
  • CHANGE 5 :inclusive contributive groups (open to non members) in charge of implementing the workplan updated by functionnal groups > Possible working groups
  • and with wsf office supported by Organizing committee of next WSF event(s) (discussed in Tunis)

    Existing IC PossibleIC/CI

    ICdiagram.JPG-CIdiagram2.JPG

    view the images in greater scale

    existing IC

    ICdiagram.JPG

    possible IC

    -CIdiagram2.JPG