• cifuturG2 survey menu

Comparing

Current Version

by facilitfsm, modified October 23, 2013
to

Version 37

by facilitfsm, modified October 23, 2013

Key

  • inserted
  • deleted
  • english"WSF IC exploraiton" surveys are in english
  • espanollas encuestas "exploraciones CI y FSM" estan en ingles ( preguntas - y proximamente ciertas respuestas -, estan traducidas) se peude responder en espanol
  • francais les questionnaires "exploration CI FSM" sont en anglais ( les questions et prochainement certains réponses - sont traduites) on peut y repondre en francais

.P1200310.JPG.P1200309.JPG.P1200308.JPG.P1200307.JPG.P1200312.JPG.P1200313.JPG

Here is a proposed "menu" of various survey proposals, about WSF process and IC, developed in relation with task of Tunis G2 working group on IC future in the context of WSF process (with inputs of group G3)

  • Surveys, called "explorations", are ranging from 10 to 45 minutes to fill /conduct- They have few required fields, and it is possible to reedit one 's response -ie polish it . It is possible to see the responses of others

    Each version 1, 2a, 2b, 3 of WSF and IC "Explorations" have their focus , pros and cons,browse the overview tablein colors (-)(-)(-)(-)(-) - read their questions and Test them ! ( questions are also in ES and FR). You can send your comments to group G2: mailing list : cifutur-consultations en lists.openfsm.net http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/lists/cifutur-consultations or to the adress : cifutur.consultations in gmail.com

    • explorations madehttp://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-exploration1~xa0responses-en

    • statistics about explorations 1 already made

    • QUESTIONS

    • Your name and emailYour organisation(s) Have you participated in IC meetings

      Q1- Is WSF process our "common good" ?, and should we, participants in this process, actively care about it ?

      Q2 - As wsf participant, do you feel motivated enough to support this WSF process by means that are within your reach?

      Q3 - As wsf participant, do you feel that WSF world events are a useful "tool" in current context?

      Q4 - Do you feel that a "central body" servicing/facilitating/impulsing wsf process is a necessity ?

      Q5 – if you answered rather yes in question 4, what are the relevant minimal missions of such a central body ?

      Q6 - What role has played IC in the past 5 years ?

      Q7 - What is your perception of desire and motivation in IC members and potential members to change IC ?

      Q8 - Is it possible/desirable to create a dynamics inside IC aiming at "delivering" more than IC has been delivering in the last 5 years?

      Q9 - What are current IC main assets / strengths?

      Q10 - What are IC main problems / weaknesses?

      Q11 - In which directions should a change in IC be worked out, if needed?

      Q12 - Is there enough “political / methodological “ consensus inside IC to move somewhere, or is IC stalled ?

      Q13 - is it possible /relevant that IC dissolves and proposes another frame of facilitation/service for wsf process, without jeopardizing wsf process

      Q14 - is it possible/useful/wise to keep a "minimal" IC afloat at minimal cost ?

      Q15 – Is it be possible/relevant/wise to develop other servicing/facilitating/ipulsing groups with different contributive capacity/profile?

      Q16 - How can a common vision of "what to do ?" be build in and around IC ?

    • B - Explorations 2in 2 parts, for IC members and WSF active participants/facilitators ( eg organizers of events ) a motivated public beyond IC members :
      • Explorations 2B on WSF and IC- 10 questions on WSF then on IC for IC members and WSF active participants/facilitators ( eg organizers of events ) : a motivated public beyond IC members (20 minutes) https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1cv18TF6drL1A_sYFT9kDfxx_49GtkluCsn1X8njZSOw/viewform
          • Your nameYour email adress Your organization(s)

            Q1 - What is your factual experience in WSF process

            Q2 : How would you describe yourself regarding “WSF process”

            Q3 : Select some opinions close to yours regarding WSF process

            Q4 : What have been/could be your significant contributions to WSF process?

            Q5 : What time and funds would you and your organization POTENTIALLY be ready to contribute to support the process

            Q6 : What is the scope of tasks of IC in supporting / impulsing WSF process?

            Q6bis (optional) What is the relevant role IC on each of the 20 wsf faclitation /impulsion tasks proposed

            Q7 : Which recommendation would you support regarding IC for the coming period?

            Q8 : From a general view point, how do you see “ideal" IC members/participants?

            Q9 : How do you see your possible personal participation in or around IC ?

            Q10 : How about an "exploration 3" , focused on IC missions, IC basic operation, and IC meetings agenda ?



      • C -Explorations 3 on IC- (drafted first) 15 questions on WSF and on IC - for people having an idea of IC meetings - focused on IC internal organizing - structure - meetings , in the perspective of an enhanced IC, which but one option for the future of IC ( 45 minutes) https://docs.google.com/forms/d/11mFvYyfw1MHciCsxFNB3BkX-5m21w3mhPetM6Hn1meQ/viewform
        • your overall time available for consultation- your contacts- your organizations- your sf / wsf ic experience- your time available for wsf ic/ci consultation

          Q1 - wsf process area and scope of action wsf ic/ci

          Q2 - self defined missions of wsf ic/ci body related to wsf process

          Q3 - your view on securing a future for wsf ic/ci

          Q4 - name of wsf ic/ci body

          Q5 - outwards action of wsf ic/ci entity

          Q6 - type of body

          Q7 - who can be members/initiators/stimulators in this wsf ci/ic (whatever their names)?

          Q8 - size & composition of wsf ic/ci body

          Q9 - consensus decision modalities

          Q10 - principles and options about organisation - working groups

          Q11 - stimulating contribution of wsf ic/ci members

          Q12 - towards which outputs are wsf ic/ci meetings organized?

          Q13 - "time for topic" table [

          Q14 "time for situation" table

          Q15 refining alternatives

        • ((cifutur survey menu questions fr))
        • ((cifutur survey menu questions es))
        • ((cifutur survey menu questions ar))
      • ((cifutur survey menu questions en))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration1 en)) ((cifuturG2 exploration1 responses en)) ((cifuturG2 exploration1 responses))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration1 es)) ((cifuturG2 exploration1 responses es))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration1 fr)) ((cifuturG2 exploration1 responses fr))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration1 statistics))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2a en)) ((cifuturG2 exploration2a responses en))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2a es)) ((cifuturG2 exploration2a responses es))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2a fr)) ((cifuturG2 exploration2a responses fr))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2a statistics))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2a1 en))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2a1 es))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2a1 fr))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2b en)) ((cifuturG2 exploration2b summar responses))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2b es))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2b fr))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2C en)) ((cifuturG2 exploration2C responses)) ((cifuturG2 exploration2C summar responses))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2C es))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration2C fr))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration3 en)) ((cifuturG2 exploration3 summar responses))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration3 es))
      • ((cifuturG2 exploration3 fr))

      • exploration 2C
        https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1jeklcMgjhDlz8jaKLR1nmY4Mu5JeF86gmcdtoS6hl9Q/viewform