Francine is right: Group 2 has to think about strategies and the future of the IC and group 3 about the WSF.
Best regards
Hugo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hugo Braun
Mitglied des Attac Koordinierungskreises
Metzer Str. 8
D-40476 Düsseldorf
Tel +49 211 674980
braun@attac.de
www.attac.de
http://www.umverteilen-macht-gerechtigkeit.eu/
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Francine Mestrum [mailto:mestrum@skynet.be]
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. April 2013 15:02
An: cifutur-consultations@lists.openfsm.net
Betreff: [G2 - CI futur Consultations] mandate G2 and other groups
Archive: http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/lists/cifutur-consultations/archive/2013/04/1366987984823
Dear friends,
First of all, Thanks to Pierre and Laura for making these lists available. They should give us a good opportunity to exchange ideas.
One question however: I see that the mandate of group 2 is limited to 'consultations' and the mandate of group 3 is worded as 'strategieS' - this is not what I understood in Tunis.
The consultations of group 2 are meant to be able to discuss the strategy of the IC, whereas I understood the mandate of group 3 to concern the strategy of the WSF.
Please let me know whether this is correct.
Thanks for your help
--
Archive: http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/lists/cifutur-consultations/archive/2013/04/1366981321432
To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to cifutur-consultations@lists.openfsm.net. Please contact cifutur-consultations-manager@lists.openfsm.net for questions.
--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to cifutur-consultations@lists.openfsm.net. Please contact cifutur-consultations-manager@lists.openfsm.net for questions.