I'm glad to see this list made manifest, I look forward eagerly to our discussions! Since we have all just been added to this list, and likely many are wondering if someone is going to step out from behind a curtain and present with a neatly organized plan for the discussion - I hope I'm not mistaken, but I have a hunch that this isn't going to happen, nobody is coming to rescue us, and we are left to organize ourselves! So I'll ask the first question: Is there already a moderator for this discussion list? If so, then I'm happy to cede the floor, but if we are left to organize ourselves, then I would propose we begin by first establishing agreement on the basic logistical questions: - Agreements for the appropriate use of this list; moderation responsibilities, and guidelines. - Defining infrastructure for information to exist online (website/wiki; where/how?) as well as other communications practices, such as online meetings and voice conferencing. Normally, I would propose we find a time for a meeting or call by making an availability schedule, and creating a pad for making the agenda together, then using the meeting to discuss the tasks and roles ahead of us, and how to address them collaboratively and effectively. But out of respect for the diversity in our accustomed ways of working, and getting acquainted with a new group of people, I would prefer to tread lightly, and open the discussion to others in a way generates interest and participation. I look forward to all that we can accomplish together! Another World Is Possible!#
Shawn Carrié
OWS
------ Original message ------From: gina vargasDate: 4/26/2013 15:16To: cifutur-consultations@...;Subject:[G2 - CI futur Consult Carto Eval Synth] Re: [G2 - CI futur Consultations] mandate G2 and other groupsHola, thanks Pierre and Laura for the task. I think also that Francine is right! in relation to the task of group 2. I wonder anyhow how we are going to continue?warm regards
Gina2013/4/26 Hugo Braun <braun@...>
Francine is right: Group 2 has to think about strategies and the future of the IC and group 3 about the WSF.
Best regards
Hugo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hugo Braun
Mitglied des Attac Koordinierungskreises
Metzer Str. 8
D-40476 Düsseldorf
Tel +49 211 674980
braun@...
www.attac.de
http://www.umverteilen-macht-gerechtigkeit.eu/
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Francine Mestrum [mailto:mestrum@...]
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. April 2013 15:02
An: cifutur-consultations@...
Betreff: [G2 - CI futur Consultations] mandate G2 and other groups
Dear friends,
First of all, Thanks to Pierre and Laura for making these lists available. They should give us a good opportunity to exchange ideas.
One question however: I see that the mandate of group 2 is limited to 'consultations' and the mandate of group 3 is worded as 'strategieS' - this is not what I understood in Tunis.
The consultations of group 2 are meant to be able to discuss the strategy of the IC, whereas I understood the mandate of group 3 to concern the strategy of the WSF.
Please let me know whether this is correct.
Thanks for your help
--
Archive: http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/lists/cifutur-consultations/archive/2013/04/1366981321432
To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to cifutur-consultations@.... Please contact cifutur-consultations-manager@... for questions.
--
Archive: http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/lists/cifutur-consultations/archive/2013/04/1366987984823
To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to cifutur-consultations@.... Please contact cifutur-consultations-manager@... for questions.
--Archive: http://openfsm.net/[…]/1367003809627To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to cifutur-consultations@.... Please contact cifutur-consultations-manager@... for questions.
text.html (text/html) 7.1 kB