dear Jason,

thank you for this. I did not have the chance to be at the latest meetings and i was wondering if this response was discussed or what indeed if anything was discussed about the LG letter.

Perhaps you could circulate the letter you wish to write to the LG in this list so that we all can have still some chance to edit, reflect and suggest?

Of course, as you very rightly suggest, the ideal response could just be to simply convey our desire to meet as soon as possible in a skype chat in order to exchange our views on the issues raised in an open and frank conversation with the LG members

Thanks
giuseppe

2009/12/11 Jason Nardi <jason.nardi@gmail.com>
Dear all,

if it is ok with you, I'm going to send a reply today to the Liason Group with a compilation of our responses from our debate and trying to set a date for an online meeting with them.

Hopefully we can overcome this critical moment with a mutual clarification.

cheers,
Jason

2009/12/7 bettina gozzano <bg.64.it@gmail.com>

care e cari tutti,
ci scusiamo per il ritardo nella partecipazione al dibattito generato dal report del LG ma diversi motivi ce lo hanno impedito fino ad oggi.
Crediamo che la lettera  di Roberto Savio abbia  risposto molto puntualmente  a una parte delle critiche del LG e concordiamo con gran parte delle precisazioni e valutazioni dei membri della commissione che sono un positivo sintomo di attività e dibattito della Com Com.
Il report dell'LG anche se a dir poco "inusuale", offre a tutti noi la possibilità da un lato di chiarire eventuali equivoci e grosse inesattezze sull'operato della Comm Comm una volta per tutte, dall'altro di avviare una discussione interna alla commissione comunicazione per arrivare a definire   finalmente una governance efficace, condivisa, e rispettata da tutti.
Pensiamo sia necessario organizzare il prima possiblile l'incontro via chat proposto dal LG anche perchè il processo forum del 2010 , come indicato nel piano di comunicazione, non può funzionare se tutte le commissioni, i gruppi di lavoro e i membri del CI  non lavorano nella più grande armonia e fiducia gli uni  negli altri.

grazie per l'attenzione

Antonio, Bettina
FocusPuller

EN:
Visualizza caratteri romani
dear all,
We apologize for the delay in participating in the debate generated by the report of the LG but several reasons unabled us to partecipate until today.
We believe that the letter of Roberto Savio has responded very punctually with some of the criticisms of the LG and we also agree  with most of the details and evaluations of the commission members which are a positive sign of activity and debate.
The report
sended by LG, though quite "unusual", gives us all the opportunity to clarify any misconceptions and inaccuracies about  Comm Comm work once and for all, and on the other hand, to initiate a discussion within the CommunicationCommission  to get to finally establish effective governance, agreed and respected by all.
We think it is necessary
first to organize the proposed meeting via chat with the  LG  also because the process of 2010, as indicated in the communication plan can not work if all the committees, working groups and members of the IC does not work in greater harmony and trust in each other.

Thanks for your attention

Antonio, Bettina
Focuspuller




--
Archive: http://openfsm.net/[…]/1260190207917
To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to communication-commission-discussion@lists.openfsm.net. Please contact communication-commission-discussion-manager@lists.openfsm.net for questions.



--
Archive: http://openfsm.net/[…]/1260525216750

To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to communication-commission-discussion@lists.openfsm.net. Please contact communication-commission-discussion-manager@lists.openfsm.net for questions.