• Communication commission discussion

  • Fwd: Other News - Nice attack: how vulnerable are we to ‘low-techterror’?

    from bazril on Jul 16, 2016 11:23 AM
    Ref: terror in Nice
    _____
    
    Dear Emmanuel, Titus and Lusson families, Martine, Jöelle and friends,
    Just a note of solidarity with you and with the french people after the
    awful massacre in Nice.
    Share the sense of shock, insanity and absurd mass murder of innocent
    people.
    It reminds me of "Les Justes" written by Albert Camus, a painful insight of
    the "logic" of terror by any source, be it fundamentalist religious,
    political sectarianism and/or state terror.
    Herewith forward a note about this awful deed.
    Abrazos
    /Azril
    
    
    
    
    
    [image: []]
    
    
    
    *Nice attack: how vulnerable are we to ‘low-tech terror’?*
    
    *By Mark Briskey* - The Conversation / Newsweek*
    
    France has again been the scene of a lethal terrorist attack. At least one
    attacker drove through and then opened fire on crowds of French and foreign
    citizens enjoying Bastille Day celebrations in Nice, killing at least 80
    people and injuring scores more.
    
    Though there is as yet little solid information on who conducted this
    attack and whether any particular terrorist group can claim responsibility,
    it has shown what dreadful impact can be caused by the use of an innocuous
    and familiar part of modern life – a motor vehicle.
    
    *A long history*
    
    Though this attack included the use of firearms and hand grenades, it would
    seem the great mass of casualties was caused by the deliberate driving of
    the vehicle at high speed into clusters of people.
    
    Though eventually shot dead, the attacker managed to exact a dreadful toll
    primarily through use of a vehicle.
    
    The use of vehicles to deliver catastrophic destruction has a long history.
    Timothy McVeigh’s truck-borne bombing in April 1995 killed 168 people in
    Oklahoma City in the US. And just a few weeks ago, a truck packed with
    explosives killed more than 200 and injured hundreds more Iraqi people
    innocently undertaking their Eid shopping in Baghdad.
    
    All manner of transportation methods have been used as a means of
    destruction. Vehicles from the motor car to trucks, motorbikes, bicycles
    and before that even horse-drawn carriages have been used to conduct
    terrorist attacks against governments and civilians alike in countries as
    diverse as Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom.
    
    *How can people be protected?*
    
    What’s concerning about the Nice attack is that a low-technology pervasive
    tool of modern society was used as the primary weapon with such dreadful
    success.
    
    If this attack has been inspired by Islamic State’s exhortations to attack
    the West with whatever implement is at hand, there are new implications for
    the security of social spaces.
    
    In 2014, a radicalised individual deliberately drove over two Canadian
    soldiers. One soldier died. So, do we now have to fear a new “low-tech
    terrorism”?
    
    We are already aware in modern societies of the risks of irresponsibly
    driven vehicles. The accidental and deliberate use of vehicles to kill and
    maim has also been a factor in trying to create secure spaces for
    pedestrians in malls and kerbside dining venues. In 1983, Douglas Crabbe
    deliberately drove his 20-tonne truck into a crowded bar in the Northern
    Territory in Australia, killing five and seriously injuring 16.
    
    In this regard we are all familiar with the installation of bollards and
    other large immovable devices at the entrances to malls, government
    buildings and even adjacent al-fresco dining places.
    
    As is the case with any high-tech threats, what’s key is whether those
    individuals who plot such activities have come to the notice of government
    security and policing agencies. While such agencies can monitor the plots
    of those extremists it has knowledge of, it is regrettably entirely
    possible there are individuals whom the government is not aware of.
    
    The motor vehicle is such an everyday part of our society. And it is
    possible there are individuals who may be motivated to copy this attack.
    
    Similarly, it is possible there could simply be other individuals who have
    become thoroughly radicalised who now see this as a low-tech option to plot
    in their home countries. The Nice attack will have consequences for how
    those spaces where people enjoy recreation and events are planned.July 15,
    2016
    
    **Mark Briskey is senior lecturer in National Security and International
    Relations at Curtin University.*
    
    
    [image: []]
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    <br/>
    English mailing list
    English@...
    <br/>
    <br/>
    To unsubscribe, send an email to: ENGLISH-unsubscribe@...
    <a href="mailto:ENGLISH-unsubscribe@...">Unsubscribe mail list
    ENGLISH</a>