Ref: Learning as we move forward!
Azril

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

*Climate in movement…, Movements in movement… *

[This long but very self-critical essay is taken from an extensive, and
ongoing, critical discussion on movements and their contradictions on the
‘Social Movements’ (as in ‘International forum for discussion and
information on social movements’) listserve, triggered by a blog that
Laurence Cox posted there on XR (where he is list admin) :

*Extinction Rebellion : We Need To Talk About The Future*

Sam J Knights

            Thanks Laurence, and thanks Gordon Asher for this post.

            JS

fwd

Begin forwarded message:

*From: *Gordon Asher <gordonasher@...>
*Subject: **Re: Interesting critique from centrally within XR - Extinction
Rebellion Re: Extinction Rebellion and the benefits of thinking harder
about movements*
*Date: *October 29, 2019 at 8:24:01 PM EDT
*To: *SOCIAL-MOVEMENTS@...
*Reply-To: *International forum for discussion and information on social
movements <SOCIAL-MOVEMENTS@...>

It's a really interesting (and admirable?) piece of critical
self-reflection (returning to a point Laurence and others have made, for
the need for such) from someone very centrally involved, - I think?


*Extinction Rebellion: We Need To Talk About The Future*
Sam J Knights
<https://medium.com/@...?source=post_page-----95459aa4d4e0---------------------->
Oct 23
<https://medium.com/@.../extinction-rebellion-we-need-to-talk-about-the-future-95459aa4d4e0?source=post_page-----95459aa4d4e0---------------------->
https://medium.com/@.../extinction-rebellion-we-need-to-talk-about-the-future-95459aa4d4e0

*Dear everyone.*

This is a love letter to Extinction Rebellion.

A movement that I devoted the last year of my life to. Lost jobs over. Got
arrested with. Put everything on hold for. A movement that I believed in. A
movement that believed in me. A movement that changed the debate. And that
now needs to change.

It is also a letter addressed to those who have criticised us. An apology.
A response. And, ultimately, an invitation.

I know that some of my friends will find this letter far too critical.
Others will find it far too lenient. Either way, I don’t really mind. I
hope, ultimately, it is honest. I am not writing it to appease or to
placate anybody. Both sides are right about some things, and both sides are
wrong about others.

But I hope we can agree on one thing. This year has changed everything.

The School Strikes. The Sunrise Movement. Zero Hour. The minority world has
finally woken up to something the majority world has been trying to tell us
for decades. The world is on fire. People are dying. Children are starving.
The fossil fuel companies are refusing to change. And we need to fight back.

In April, the United Kingdom became the first country to declare a climate
emergency, following a fortnight of continuous protest from Extinction
Rebellion. A mass campaign of non-violent civil disobedience which saw
roads blocked, roundabouts occupied, and bridges transformed into gardens.

It was, more than anything, a challenge. A challenge to the current system.
A warning to our politicians and to our leaders that if they could not
respond to the climate crisis with the seriousness and the scale it demands
— if they were not prepared to imagine a future without death or
destruction, without power or oppression — then we would. Me and you. The
ordinary people.

Last month, the Labour Party made the first step towards answering this
call for climate and ecological justice. It still has a very long way to
go, but the changes in policy are incredibly encouraging. At its annual
conference in Brighton, party members and trade unions worked hand in hand
to pass the most radical and progressive policy to have ever been tabled:
the Green New Deal. If enacted, this would mean the public ownership of
major industries, a radical redistribution of wealth, the repeal of all
anti-union laws, and a net zero emissions target of 2030.

A month later and Extinction Rebellion held its October Rebellion in
London. For a huge number of different reasons, it did not have the impact
of our protests in April. People knew what to expect this time round. Some
of our actions were breathtakingly beautiful. Some of our actions were
painfully idiotic. Our protests were banned. Our sites were cleared. It was
a disappointing end to the fortnight.

Of course, it was by no means a failure. In less than a year, we had staged
two of the largest civil disobedience events in the history of the United
Kingdom. And, in October, we had grown once again. More people came down to
the sites and more people stayed to defend them. But there was no pink boat
in Oxford Circus. No beautiful garden bridge. And something definitely felt
different.

At the same, we were facing enormous critique from all sides. Internally,
we were also engaged in a fierce and passionate debate about the future of
our movement. In Extinction Rebellion, we have always called for system
change. We have always talked about freedom, equality, and solidarity. But
many of us now think we need to be more specific. We want Extinction
Rebellion to become proactive in its anti-racism. We want the movement to
develop a deeper analysis of capital and control, and to acknowledge more
publicly the crises of capitalism and colonialism that are — in no small
part — responsible for this crisis.

The School Strikes Movement and Extinction Rebellion have changed the way
that we in the minority world think about the climate and ecological
emergency. Inside every industry and every institution there are now
hundreds of people who have been persuaded to do something. The British
public consider climate change more important now than they ever have and
the Labour Party has one of the most progressive and ambitious policies of
any party in Europe.

This year, the debate changed. And we have to change with it.

As activists, we spend our lives thinking about how best to communicate
with the outside world. We write articles trying to win people over. We
give speeches trying to persuade people we are right. We go into your
workplaces and your community centres. We organise. We mobilise. We hope we
cut through.

In doing so, we are sometimes in danger of neglecting one another. Because
we find those conversations even more difficult, don’t we? Because,
ultimately, we all have very different visions of the future, different
experiences of the past, and different understandings of the present.
Because what’s the point in talking, anyway, when the ice caps are melting,
and the oceans are rising, and people are being murdered in our rainforests?

But talking to one another is important. And, right now, there is a very
important question that we all need to discuss:

*Do we continue with Extinction Rebellion? Or is it time for something new?*

It pains me to write those words.

I joined Extinction Rebellion a year ago. I know that doesn’t sound like a
very long time, but the movement was still in its infancy then. In fact, we
hadn’t even started. We organised our first protest on the 31st October
2018 and, to my surprise, over a thousand people turned up. Amongst them
was a fifteen year old girl named Greta Thunberg, who had come all the way
from Sweden in an electric car with her dad. In the media, we were
supported by Vandana Shiva, Noam Chomsky and the former Archbishop of
Canterbury Rowan Williams.

Since then, I have held a number of different roles within the movement. I
have worked in the media and messaging team, the political strategy team,
and — when it was functioning — the rapid response team. I love this
movement with all my heart. Our activists are, without exception, some of
the kindest, most thoughtful, and most passionate people I have ever met.

Whilst we may disagree on some issues, I want to acknowledge that nothing I
write here is personal. Mass movements do not operate like reformist
pressure groups. We do not have our opinions handed down to us from on
high. Disagreement is natural. In fact, disagreement is essential. In this
case, I simply have a difference of opinion.

For the last month, the movement has been engaged in a fierce debate over
our collective future and it will, I am sure, continue this debate in the
weeks and the months to come. I hope more people can join. I hope more
people can join and push to be better. Because, right now, Extinction
Rebellion really needs to change. And if it can’t change, it is finished.

Unfortunately, I don’t think I can be a part of that change.

The last year has been one of the best years of my life. But it has also
been one of the worst. I was arrested at the very start of this year and
the trial has only just concluded, eight months later. In the meantime, I
have lost work and been targeted by the police. I am thinking about climate
change the moment I wake up to the moment I go to sleep and the effect on
my mental health has been really damaging. I really need a break.

It is one of those old ironies of climate activism: that in fighting for a
more sustainable way of life, we are often forced to live a totally
unsustainable existence. I do not want to burn out completely. So I am
taking some time now in order to be more useful in the future. Perhaps I
will come back to Extinction Rebellion. I don’t really know.

But I still feel guilty for leaving. And so I wanted to say something
before I do.

*The critiques of Extinction Rebellion are right.*

I don’t mean the right wing think tanks that call us terrorists. Or the
tabloid papers that call us hypocrites. Or the conservative columnists who
refuse to even engage with the science. Obviously, they are all batshit. We
know that. We can discount them and we can move on.

But the critiques we have received from the left. Not all of them, of
course. But most of them. Most of them are right. In their reasoning. In
their analysis. In how we need to change.

If Extinction Rebellion is going to be a long-term political project, then
it needs to put climate and ecological justice at the heart of everything
it does. It needs to proactively defend migrant rights and to stand in
solidarity with those on the frontlines of this crisis. It needs to call
for reparations and for further conversations around climate debt, land
rights, and ecocide. It needs to better articulate how we extend and reform
our broken democracy. It needs to reimagine our global finance system and,
in doing so, provide a nuanced critique of our current economic system. It
needs to understand how the climate crisis intersects with issues of race,
class, gender, and sexuality. It needs to stop putting out such stupid
messages about how prison is lovely, and being arrested is fun, and the
police are all great. This is the most important social justice struggle of
all our lives. And we have to start acting like it.

Having said that, I also recognise the scale of this challenge.

The role of the activist is to reimagine the world. We need to rewild the
world, but first we need to rewild the imagination. We must attempt to
articulate our dreams for the future and, in doing so, we must acknowledge
that those dreams do not always come fully formed. That process is long and
it is arduous. Ultimately, we need to take everyone with us. With love and
with empathy. With a generosity of spirit.

Extinction Rebellion needs to change. But anybody who thinks that change
can happen overnight is taking you for a fool. Meaningful solidarity and
effective political education do not happen in the blink of an eye. The
work ahead is going to be slow. It is going to take time. It is going to be
hard.

One of the biggest questions we now face is how that deeper, slower, more
vital work is able to still take place within an emergency response to the
climate crisis. The environmental movement has always been a balance
between running too fast and walking too slow. Our slogans read: “act now”,
“tell the truth”, and “we’re running out of time”. But how are we meant to
“tell the truth” if we never stop to consider it? To check our own
privilege and to listen to the experiences of others?

We cannot continue to think of these two things as contradictory, or as
somehow in competition. Understanding the climate crisis and imagining a
more progressive future goes hand in hand with the need to act now. One
influences the other. Indeed, it enriches our activism. It makes us better.

*So, let’s talk about the movement today.*

Mass movements are messy. It’s the best thing about them and it’s the worst
thing about them.

Extinction Rebellion is a decentralised mass movement made up of thousands
of different people. Academics, politicians, schoolchildren, scientists,
grandparents, doctors, nurses, postmen, teachers, lawyers, priests, rabbis.
There are now Extinction Rebellion chapters in over sixty different
countries and in every continent except for Antarctica. We all act
autonomously. There is no central line of command. There are no leaders.
And our critics often forget that.

There is no denying that the April rebellion managed to alter the public
perception of what is and what is not possible, not only in the wider green
movement but in every activist group up and down the country. In every
town, street, and home. Together, we created a space for debate. We proved
that non-violent civil disobedience works and, in doing so, we created
space not only in a figurative sense, but also in a very literal one.

Occupying five iconic locations in central London, we transformed the
streets of the city into public stages on which democracy could flourish.
We held talks, debates, rallies, assemblies, performances, gigs, poetry
readings, and everything in between. We talked about economics, politics,
science, race, class, gender, sexuality, religion, capitalism, colonialism,
power, growth, degrowth, protest law, ecocide, reparations, climate debt,
anarchism, socialism, democracy. We talked about everything we could with
everyone we knew. We dreamt together. We attempted to imagine the future.

Of course, this work was not done alone. It worked alongside other emerging
movements, like the School Strike movement in Europe and the Sunrise
Movement in America. It learnt from the justice movements that preceded it
and it paid homage to activists in the majority world. It learnt from the
people on the frontlines of this crisis who have been leading this movement
for decades and regard us — quite rightly — as relative newcomers. We often
talk in the climate movement of the disproportionate effect we in the
minority world have had on the majority world. We are responsible for the
vast majority of carbon emissions, and yet it is people in the countries
least responsible for this crisis that are feeling the effects of it most.
But we talk less about the disproportionate response of our activists. For
too long we have allowed indigenous communities and activist groups in the
Global South to do the vast majority of our resistance work for us, before
we then step in at the last moment and claim all the credit.

Extinction Rebellion has certainly fallen into this trap. Some of the
people in our movement have allowed their egos to run away with them. But I
think that is changing. And I think it will continue to change, for the
better. The last week saw protests in more than sixty cities across the
world, from Mumbai to Cape Town, Dublin to New York, Banjul to Islamabad.
Every iteration of this movement is different to the next. A group in
Ghana, for example, cannot use the same tactics to a group in France. Of
course, the core essence of the movement remains the same. But everything
else is able to change. In fact, the ability to change, and change quickly,
is a key part of our success.

Extinction Rebellion changes with every new person that joins us. Our
decentralised structure means that so long as you are abiding by our key
values and principles, you can start organising an action or planning a
protest or writing a speech without seeking permission or having to be
mandated to do so.

This is what allowed us to grow so rapidly. It encouraged a huge diversity
of tactics to naturally emerge as people felt empowered to take action in
whatever way that made sense to them. It meant we worked quickly and never
allowed ourselves time to get stuck. For those of us in the central office,
we knew things were working not when we had organised everything ourselves
— but when things started happening that we didn’t know anything about.

Of course, there are also various problems with this organising model that
warrant a much longer conversation. A structure that relies on empowering
people to go out and act often then struggles with its own internal
decision making. It also struggles to mitigate for power and to sensitively
respond to questions of privilege or conflict.

*It also means that occasionally people do something stupid. Like send
flowers to a police station. Or jump on top of a train.*

I am, by the way, not blaming individual people for these actions. Although
individuals do need to take a portion of the blame, these mistakes cannot
be dismissed as simply accidental. They are part of our movement. They are
manifestations of an idea. Or a tactic. Or evidence of our ignorance.

Like all good movements, we need to look at them and we need to learn from
them.

The infamous train action is, I think, a good case study in the limits of
decentralised activism. It was planned by a tiny faction of the movement,
opposed by the overwhelming majority of our activists, and yet it was still
allowed to happen under the banner of Extinction Rebellion. It soaked up
all the media coverage that day, distracting from more thoughtful actions
and altering the public perception of our protests. Yet it was only about
ten or fifteen people who were ever convinced it would work.

It is worth saying that this same group tried to do the exact same thing
during the April rebellion. At the time, we still had a more hierarchical
way of organising; we established a body that had oversight over the entire
rebellion called the Rapid Response Team, which was supposedly
representatives from different subgroups across the organisation but was
basically just fifteen people from the central team. I was in the meeting
when this action was finally put to bed and I can tell you that had a
couple of us not threatened to publicly quit if this action took place,
then it would have happened in April.

There are certain groups in Extinction Rebellion who believe that economic
disruption is the only strategy worth pursuing. This was deeply ingrained
in the genesis of the movement and a strategic view that many of the
original members cannot be dissuaded of. They are intent on disrupting
transport networks and getting people arrested en masse . This view is
sometimes presented as the main view of Extinction Rebellion, because it is
loudly championed in the media by some of the founders, but in fact it is
now a relatively fringe position. Most activists have a much more nuanced
theory of change, one that relies on a vast multitude of tactics.

*We need to find different structures if we are to achieve different
victories.*

In a decentralised mass movement, those with the loudest voices reign
supreme. The challenge therefore is to build a progressive movement that
does not fall prey to these voices.

I think the time is now right for us to ditch our undemocratic ways of
working. Our movement has been exceptionally efficient in mobilising
thousands of people, but now it needs to think long and hard about the
principle of accountability. At the present moment, there is no
accountability whatsoever.

We need to think very carefully about what our purpose is going forward and
what we hope to achieve. When I was arrested in February for peacefully
protesting outside of an oil and gas conference, I had organised the action
on my own terms. I am, to be perfectly honest, not that prepared to get
arrested for sitting in the middle of a road. I see the necessity of it and
I admire those who do it, but personally I wanted to do something that was
more significant and sent out a clearer political message. The
psychological strain of being arrested, then charged, and finally having to
stand trial is immense. As a young person, I am not going to make that
sacrifice on a whim. The action I organised was different. It was a
targeted protest with a very specific purpose. It had messaging around the
neo-colonial practises of fossil fuel companies in Africa.

In other words: if I was going to rebel, I wanted to do it on my own terms.


Extinction Rebellion has always relied on symbolic actions to build the
movement. When we first started, we mobilised people by picking politically
astute targets, dominating the news coverage, and then finding ways in
which people could be instantly enfolded into the group. This is something,
to be blunt, most activist groups are not very good at. With an emboldened
movement, we then turned our attention to mass participation actions which
were designed to maximise economic disruption. Some of these worked better
than others. Most, to analyse them objectively, failed on our own terms:
they did not cause much economic disruption and they did not hold our
vision either. But they succeeded where others have not: they brought
people in.

With every new activist comes a new theory of change. They multiply. They
coexist. They are not particularly easy to pin down.

It is not often acknowledged that those of us at the heart of Extinction
Rebellion are generally a lot more radical than the people who support us.
In the same way, the wider movement is often more cautious or more liberal
than the people in the central team. There are people who think the word
“rebellion” is a neat rhetorical flourish, and those of us who think it is
absolutely essential.

*What attracted me to Extinction Rebellion was the call for system change.*

Contrary to what some commentators would have you believe, Extinction
Rebellion was pretty much the only group in 2018 that had a systemic
critique of the climate crisis and was prepared to shout about it. Of
course, there were and are other groups. But I think it is worth being
honest here: their message did not cut through and it was not matched with
the same drive and ambition for action. Crucially, Extinction Rebellion
also has the first step to a rational and coherent solution: non-violent
civil disobedience on a scale we had never seen before.

I think the criticisms of Extinction Rebellion for being too liberal or
lacking in any class analysis are largely overblown. Extinction Rebellion
is, after all, a natural successor of the Occupy movement. I am always
surprised by how infrequently this connection is made. Most of the
coordinators of Extinction Rebellion were involved in Occupy. I wish we
talked about this more. I wish we had learnt from it more. But they do have
a good analysis of capital and control. Don’t get me wrong, the messaging
still needs to improve a lot. But we have been very clear about the need
for system change. In a recent report for Policy Exchange, we were
described as “an anti-capitalist movement that envisages no possible
accommodation with a free market economy”. I was singled out, as were some
of my friends, for our class based analysis of the current situation.

In the October rebellion, the police banned all Extinction Rebellion
activity — in a move we do not yet know was legal — after we disrupted the
financial district with a series of roadblocks. We have consistently
challenged the rich and the powerful and been targeted as a result. If the
police response was unlawful, it would not be the first time. Two months
ago, I was banned by the police from the Labour Party Conference, despite
having no criminal record whatsoever and being an elected delegate to
conference. The police later admitted they had behaved incorrectly.

We have to remember that meaningful resistance to the current system will
always be suppressed by a violent and censorious state. Our critiques of
capitalism have brought us into direct contact with the violence of the
state. But we cannot let this dissuade us from doing so. In fact, in a
strange sort of way, it is a sign that our protests our working. It is
imperative that at the heart of the movement we have a coherent critique of
the current economic model and — most importantly — an idea of what a
greener and more sustainable economics looks like.

It is also important to acknowledge our own privilege when talking about
class. The right-wing have consistently attacked Extinction Rebellion for
being a “middle class” movement. It is true that many of the people who
protest with Extinction Rebellion are middle class, as many people in the
wider green movement are. This needs to change. But the central team is not
overwhelmingly middle class and neither in fact are the founders. The
problem is our messaging. Our messaging appeals to a certain type of
person, whilst inadvertently excluding others. Thus, we are not mobilising
people in the deprived areas of London, we are mobilising largely middle
class people who live in the countryside. It cannot be this way round. We
need to be listening to the working class and educating the middle class.
Not trying to run before we can walk.

However, it is also worth applying some context. Extinction Rebellion has
been very successful at mobilising a huge number of different people very
quickly; the first team I ever led had people who had just quit their
lucrative jobs in the city and people who were coming to the office in
between appointments at the job centre. To be blunt, many of the activist
groups that routinely criticise Extinction Rebellion are not as inclusive
or as diverse. Many of them are run by Oxbridge educated activists who
operate in a particular way and communicate with a specific vocabulary. I
have always felt at home in these groups, but we cannot pretend that
everyone does. Extinction Rebellion has not been successful in mobilising
the working class, but neither has anyone else. It is important we all
acknowledge that.

I am a member of the Labour Party and I have been since Jeremy Corbyn
became leader in 2015. My politics have always been rooted in class
struggle and so has my climate activism. It is, of course, true that not
everyone in Extinction Rebellion shares my politics. People are attracted
to this movement for many different reasons — we need to hang onto this
ability to mobilise people and bring people together, carefully and
compassionately, on a journey towards class consciousness. How the climate
movement talks about class is one of the most important conversations that
we all need to have in the weeks and months ahead.

We should, of course, never shy away from talking about system change.

Extinction Rebellion is based on revolutionary modes of activism. It
aspires to peaceful revolution, not in the conventional sense of the word,
but in a deeper, more reflective, and more empathetic way. We are not set
up to be a reformist activist group. We want to transform every aspect of
our society. And we believe in the people — in the power of ordinary people
like you and me — to do that for ourselves.

In transferring to the second phase of Extinction Rebellion we must not
lose the radical heart of our movement.

Non-violent civil disobedience is one of the most important tools in the
struggle for climate justice. Indeed, it has been one of the most important
tools in the struggle for justice all across the world — from the civil
rights movement to the suffragettes. In recent weeks, I have seen people
argue that all forms of disruption are wrong. Some of these arguments have
become frankly surreal. In an unequal and unjust world, modes of resistance
will obviously be complicated and compromised by the reality of organising.
But the answer is not to ditch civil disobedience, it is to do civil
disobedience better.

However, we should not get confused between revolutionary tactics that work
and revolutionary tactics that do not. Much of the research that originally
underpinned our organising is based on revolutions and rebellions under
repressive regimes and dictatorships. Whilst there certainly are some wider
lessons to be learnt here, we would be foolish to think they can be easily
transposed to a different political context. Our arrest strategy is deeply
flawed. As I have said already, it has in fact been a relatively fringe
position for a while now. But we have not been able to articulate what our
new strategy is, if in fact we have one.

We also have to acknowledge the huge criticism our past strategies have
received. In particular, much of this criticism has come from people of
colour. And rightly so.

*So, let’s talk about race.*

Extinction Rebellion has a race problem.

In fact, most activist groups do. The green movement especially. But, just
because this problem is not particular to us, it is absolutely never
something we should be complacent about. Indeed, we have to put the
struggle for racial equality at the heart of everything we do.

In 2015, the chief executive of Friends of the Earth described the climate
movement as “a white middle class ghetto”. Study after study has revealed
the shocking lack of diversity within climate NGOs and climate justice
organisations. Of course, there are some notable exceptions and some good
progress has been made over the last decade. But it should never have been
like this in the first place. Climate change is a racialised crisis. To
fail to recognise that is tantamount to white supremacy.

Anyone who tells you that this is a problem solely of Extinction Rebellion
knows nothing about the history of the climate movement in the United
Kingdom. But that does not absolve Extinction Rebellion of its complete and
utter failure to engage with issues of race. In fact, it makes it all the
more damning. This is one of the most important issues in the British
climate movement and our voice has been notably absent.

Again, it is worth pointing out where our critics have sometimes simplified
their criticism. There are many people of colour in organising roles across
the movement. I remember talking to one of our most active coordinators
about this last year, when these criticisms were first made. She said:
“when they say there are no black people in the movement, they are the
people who are whitewashing my contribution as a black woman, they are the
people not recognising my leadership”.

But there is a big difference between having black people in your movement
and being proactively antiracist in everything you do.

When I first joined Extinction Rebellion, I was told not to talk about
capitalism or colonialism on our social media accounts. Obviously, I still
did — but the advice did surprise me. The logic was that it put people off
and that we should be utilising a more universal and accessible rhetoric.
Obviously, what constitutes as universal is in itself a racialised
decision. And if you do not talk about power and privilege, then you are
making a political decision to direct your messaging towards some groups at
the exclusion of others. It is worth saying, for the record, that this
advice rarely came from people within the media team itself. It was from
coordinators in other parts of the organisation and couched in terms of
strategy and identity.

I have also witnessed the exclusion of people of colour from activist
spaces. Recently, a young woman of colour had to leave an organising group
after she shared her experiences of racism within the environmental
movement and was told whether she, not the people who had made her feel
unwelcome, should consider her place in the movement. Censorship on this
level is not only a form of exclusion, it is a form of violence. I don’t
think these attitudes are prevalent in Extinction Rebellion, but they
certainly are there. And at the moment we do not have the procedures or the
structures to deal with them. This needs to change.

Last April, my friend Farhana and I coordinated our political negotiation
strategy. This involved constructing a campaign that we hoped would force
politicians to meet us and ultimately end in the UK Parliament declaring a
climate and ecological emergency. In the end, our strategy was successful —
the day after we met with Michael Gove and John McDonnell, the United
Kingdom became the first country to declare a climate emergency. It remains
the largest victory that Extinction Rebellion can legitimately claim.

But my leadership (as a young person) and Farhana’s leadership (as a person
of colour) was routinely challenged. Farhana is one of the most
knowledgeable and experienced people in Extinction Rebellion; she is a
former lead author of the IPCC and has been working in the UN for decades.
The fact that someone like her quit her job to join us should be a story we
champion, not somebody we marginalise. During the April rebellion, Farhana
and I were seen as political reformers merely for meeting with politicians,
as we were mandated to do. A conflict resolution process was triggered
against us and we were also the subject of an open petition which called
for Farhana to be thrown out of the movement. There is no doubt in my mind
that much of this distrust, whether conscious or not, was borne of racism.

Everyone — particularly those of us on the left who purport to stand up for
justice — has a responsibility to decolonise our thinking, our theory, and
our activist practises.

Some of us have been talking about climate justice from the very beginning.
It is not true that there has been no work done on climate justice issues,
or to advance this strategy in the wider movement. Extinction Rebellion
Youth have worked very closely with Extinction Rebellion’s International
Solidarity Network to raise the voices of the Global South and to stand in
solidarity with the indigenous struggle. Many of the people joining now
have a much better political analysis and are helping to change and reshape
the movement in their own image. Similarly, local groups tend to be better
at talking about climate justice. And maybe it was best summed up by
Extinction Rebellion Scotland, who brought a big banner to the October
Rebellion which simply read: “Decolonise XR”.

Generally, the problem is not that there aren’t people talking about
climate justice within Extinction Rebellion, because there are. The problem
is that climate justice is not deeply imbedded into the values and
principles of the movement.


At the October Rebellion, a site called the Global Justice Rebellion called
for the addition of a fourth demand focused on climate and ecological
justice, loosely based on the fourth demand of Extinction Rebellion in the
US. This important site was organised by a large coalition of groups,
including many groups formally affiliated with Extinction Rebellion. This
fourth demand should now be formally adopted by Extinction Rebellion in the
United Kingdom. But climate justice cannot just be something we tack on at
the end of our demands, like an afterthought. It has to be deeply imbedded
in everything we do.

The messaging around arrests have proved particularly problematic. In part,
this criticism has focused around the strategy of mass arrests and here we
have to recognise that our experiences of the justice system are always
going to be different. Earlier this year, we wrote in the Extinction
Rebellion handbook: “Extinction Rebellion is clear that the police continue
to be structurally racist, unjust and violent, particularly towards
oppressed groups”. We have not done enough to mitigate or to protect
ourselves against that.

As with all of these critiques, the reaction can of course be overblown.
Martin Luther King understood well the tactic of mass arrests. In Alabama,
the civil rights movement won one of its most significant victories when it
decided to fill the prisons with protestors. In 1963, six hundred children
were arrested in a move that many other civil rights leaders felt deeply
uncomfortable about. Thousands of black men and women ended up in police
cells, as did Martin Luther King. And, ultimately, the campaign was
successful. The city of Birmingham rejected segregation and the protests
arguably led to one of the most significant victories of the civil rights
movement: the adoption of the Civil Rights Act.

Mass arrests have been an important tool of black resistance for a very
long time. But let’s face it: there is a big difference between Martin
Luther King telling you to get arrested and some white guy from Wales. The
civil rights movement was a movement designed by black people for black
people. Extinction Rebellion is not and therefore the strategy needs to
change, or — at the very least — adapt. And so do those in positions of
power.

*And so we go towards that change. With courage and with love.*

Now is the time to be brave.

And sometimes the bravest act is not an act at all. It is to stop. To
reflect. To listen. To learn. And to change.

And if this last year has taught us anything, it has taught us that now is
the time for change. Meaningful change. Radical change. System change. And
we all need to talk about changing. We need to accept that this will be
slow. We need to recognise that there will be many more mistakes still to
come. That this is the nature of resistance. But that, together, we can get
there.

We need to talk with one another, stand alongside one another. We need to
show people what a more loving vision of the world actually looks like. We
must transform this movement into a movement with justice at its heart.
With love and compassion deeply imbedded in everything we do.

In April, we sounded the alarm. Now we need to point towards the fire exits.

The road ahead of us is longer than the road we have already travelled.
There is no denying it is going to be difficult. After all, we are
attempting to transform every aspect of our current society. To reinvent
the world. And to do it at pace.

The debate over the future of Extinction Rebellion is a debate that all of
us need to participate in.

So, how is that change going to happen?

Well, here are some suggestions we can implement right away:

1. Adopt a fourth central demand on climate and ecological justice, calling
for reparations, land rights, ecocide law, and a renewed focus on racial
and economic equality.

2. Elect all central role-holders and establish democratic ways in which
the entire movement can decide on the most important issues. If something
is particularly contentious, there needs to be a process for triggering a
vote.

3. End the ridiculous messaging around prison being a fun place to be.
Similarly, end the simplistic messaging around policing. Work with other
activists to amplify other social justice causes now.

4. Establish trainings for all activists and organisers on climate justice
and racial equality. Hold public discussions on the politics and ideas of
the green movement. Provide ways in which activists and members of the
public can educate themselves.

5. Focus on building relationships with other activist groups and making
the link between climate change and other important political issues. I
don’t wanna be part of your revolution if it ain’t intersectional.

6. Involve everyone — including the wider climate movement — in open
discussions about the future of the movement and where we all need to go
now. Remember that the future is going to be humble. The revolution will
not happen under any one banner or any one flag. It will require all of us
to work together. To rise together. For justice. And compassion. And love.

And beyond that? Well, I don’t really know. But I suppose it’s about time
we had the conversation, isn’t it?

In the meantime, if you are still thinking of joining Extinction Rebellion,
then please do. Now is the time for fresh new activists with fresh new
ideas. What happens next is going to be hard won and bitterly fought over.
Now is not the time to criticise from the sidelines. Now is the time to
transform it. To change it. To have a hand in shaping its future. Support
the International Solidarity Group. Get behind new groups like XR
Liberation. Amplify the voices of young people, of working class people, of
people of colour. Join the Global Justice Rebellion.

I know this may sound daunting, but it will definitely be worth it.
After all, this is what real activism is all about


.______________________________

Jai Sen

Independent researcher, editor

jai.sen@...

Now based in New Delhi, India (+91-98189 11325) and in Ottawa, Canada, on
unceded Anishinaabe territory (+1-613-282 2900)

CURRENT / RECENT publications :

Jai Sen, ed, 2018a – *The Movements of Movements, Part 2 : Rethinking Our
Dance*. Ebook and hard copy available at PM Press <http://www.pmpress.org/>

Jai Sen, ed, 2018b – *The Movements of Movements, Part 1 : What Makes Us
Move ?* (Indian edition). New Delhi : AuthorsUpfront, in collaboration with
OpenWord and PM Press.  Hard copy available at MOM1AmazonIN
<https://www.amazon.in/dp/9387280101/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1522884070&sr=8-2&keywords=movements+of+movements+jai+sen>
, MOM1Flipkart
<https://www.flipkart.com/the-movements-of-movements/p/itmf3zg7h79ecpgj?pid=9789387280106&lid=LSTBOK9789387280106NBA1CH&marketplace=FLIPKART&srno=s_1_1&otracker=search&fm=SEARCH&iid=ff35b702-e6a8-4423-b014-16c84f6f0092.9789387280106.SEARCH&ppt=Search%20Page>,
and MOM1AUpFront <http://www.authorsupfront.com/movements.htm>

Jai Sen, ed, 2017 – *The Movements of Movements, Part 1 : What Makes Us
Move ?*.  New Delhi : OpenWord and Oakland, CA : PM Press.  Ebook and hard
copy available at PM Press <http://www.pmpress.org/>

*SUBSCRIBE TO World Social Movement Discuss*, an open, unmoderated, and
self-organising forum on social and political movement at any level (local,
national, regional, and global).  *To subscribe, simply send an empty email
to wsm-discuss-subscribe@...
<wsm-discuss-subscribe@...>*

________________________________________
** Inspired by the World Social Forum, WSMDiscuss – the successor to a list
named ‘WSFDiscuss’ started in 2005 - is an open, unmoderated, and
self-organising forum for the exchange of information and views on the
experience, practice, and theory of social and political movement at any
level (local, national, regional, and global), including the World Social
Forum.  Join in ! **
_______________________________________________
World Social Movement Discuss mailing list
POST to LIST : Send email to wsm-discuss@...
SUBSCRIBE : Send empty email to
wsm-discuss-subscribe@...
UNSUBSCRIBE : Send empty email to
wsm-discuss-unsubscribe@...
LIST ARCHIVES : https://lists.openspaceforum.net/pipermail/wsm-discuss/
LIST INFORMATION :
https://lists.openspaceforum.net/mailman/listinfo/wsm-discuss
POSTING GUIDELINES :
http://openspaceforum.net/twiki/tiki-index.php?page=Mailing+List+Posting+Guidelines
Old / previous WSFDiscuss List Archives :
http://openspaceforum.net/pipermail/worldsocialforum-discuss_openspaceforum.net/

Attachments

text.html (text/html) 83.4 kB