Dear Bettina,

I understand your concerns. We have to remember WSF´s methodology. Sergio´s proposal is similar to the section "Testemunhos/Temoignages" - people´s live memory.

Once I asked Rita about all Foruns´s websites. we need to build a site map with informations about what happened around the world like 2008´s Global Day. We have missed a lot of these information...We´ll need an external hard disk (or more) to put all these avaiable information. The oficial website doesn´t have all these data.

One main issue is to think this map to go further with our proposal for memory archive.

In solidarity,

Carla

--- Em qua, 15/7/09, bettina gozzano <bg.64.it@...> escreveu:

> De: bettina gozzano <bg.64.it@...>
> Assunto: [Memory&Documentation WG] PROPOSAL FOR MEMORY ARCHIVE
> Para: memory-documentationWG@...
> Data: Quarta-feira, 15 de Julho de 2009, 15:56
> 
> PROPOSAL FOR MEMORY ARCHIVE
> Hallo to everybody,
> 
> I know earlier today there was supposed to be the weekly
> chat...!
> 
> reading the last mails around wsf memory, and the very long
> project
> proposed by sergio ( sorry, i could not read it all, also
> becouse of
> the language!)
> I am a little worried to see that  a lot of enphasis
> is given to  memory of the future, but almost no concern
> about memory
> of the past!
> 
> Our group coordinator (Hilde ) is missing and no body
> pushed us to
> produce a coordinated, partecipated and inclusive memory
> project that
> has sense and that follows the given guidelines.
> I think we should
> all give a look again at Norma's  document about
> Memory of WSF  she has
> sent some time ago, wich I think is the basis for a memory
> archive
> project we should consider.
> 
> Today is supposed to be the deadline for presenting all
> groups projects+budgets;
> 
> so far the memoryGT has not presented something organic and
> inclusive work. 
> 
> I have sent some thoughts and ideas through the mail but i
> do not know if anyone has read it. 
> 
> The
> only things I have seen is about the future memory;  
> sergio's memory
> project wich is , in a way, for me not exactly a wsf memory
> recording,
> but more an idea for monitoring what people feel wsf
> process is...?The
> idea is good, but doesn't seem to me a wsf memory
> thing; I am
> skepticale about asking such big financing request for
> something that
> is really good as a museum activity that could, at the
> end,  bedonated
> to wsf process, and not viceversa.
> 
> 
> I think we need to consider 2 aspects of memory:
> tha past and the future:
> 
> 
> the PAST, which is to be mapped, collected, and possible
> edited.
> How much time and eventually money is needed is difficult
> to say, since
> it depends on the amount of material. Most of it will need
> to be copied
> and  sent to who will catalouge and edit it.  It may even
> be possible
> that some material has to be joined fisically, wich may
> mean travel
> expences. 
> 
> All groups that produce video ( but all sorts of wsf
> documentation
> can be included) should start mapping and share their lists
> of
> available memory material , and also start loading  their
> material in
> one and only wsf database ( for video is supposed to be wsftv.net),
> this way all material are collected in one container and is
> available
> to all at once ( also for a possible  consultation space
> on pc of all
> memory material at future sf)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> For the FUTURE, I think it is quite easy to say that for
> each forum
> event , together with the forum organization commitee,
> should have a
> number of people working at collecting  the memory; the
> number of
> people depends on the type of event. For this, a number of
> crews also
> with  local people involved ( for video each crew should
> be of 2
> people) have to make sure that the sf is covered (video,
> radio, text)
> as much as possible, following key plenaries, some thematic
> working
> groups, interviewing key and common people.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Meantime a catalogation strategy should be studied in order
> to be
> able to easely pick out from the common database what one
> is searching.
> I
> think we have to find/decide few main macro areas of
> contents (max 10?)
> which are words that together with date+place+event where
> the material
> has been taken+ kind of material (video, txt, audio, still
> image) +
> language of transaltion, are going to be the tags for
> extracting the
> contents of interest. Each of these elements are to be
> catalogued with
> a specific rule that has to be given, like to fill in all
> its parts in
> a pre ordinated form ( the wsftv one has to be worked on).
> 
> 
> Thank you for your attention
> 
> another world is possible!
> 
> besos
> 
> Bettina
> 
> 
> --
> Archive: http://openfsm.net/[…]/1247684632046
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject
> "unsubscribe" to memory-documentationWG@....
>  Please contact memory-documentationWG-manager@...
> for questions.
> 


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com