-
gtiandwsf wsfdiscussion points forcomment input0
Wiki modificadas recientemente November 14, 2019 por facilitfsm
inputs: @I0- @I1 - @I2 - @I3 - @I4 - @I5 - @I6 - @I7 - @I8 - @I9 - @I10 - @I11 - @I12 - @I13 - @I14 -@I15 -@I16
Bases for comment-input CxI0- CxI1 -CxI2-CxI3 -CxI4 -CxI5 -CxI6 -CxI7 -CxI8 -CxI9 -CxI10 -CxI11 -CxI12 -CxI13 -CxI14 -CxI15 -CxI16
>> How to make a comment input :
1/ Copy paste the text below in your text processor
2/ Proceed to comment/answer the sections that you wish to comment, starting from the "x"
3/ Make contact with faciltating team DIBCO1 and send them your comment input
My comment-input on input#0 by Paul
@1 WSF has stood as a tangible expression of the diffuse but vibrant “alter globalization” community, and a source of hope for the emergence of a systemic global movement.
x
@2 At the same time, the WSF has mirrored the movement’s immaturity.
x
@3 More prosaically, the logistical chaos that has plagued Forums and frustrated attendees symbolizes the underdeveloped organizational capacity of the “movement of movements.”
x
LOOKING BACK
@ 4 What has been the historic significance of the WSF?
x
@5 In what ways has its strategy of providing a neutral gathering space advanced (or curtailed) the “movement of movements”?
x
AT THE CROSSROADS
@6 Does the WSF retain its vitality as a beacon of “another world,” or is it losing momentum?
x
@7 Has its unbending commitment to radical pluralism sacrificed movement unity?
x
LOOKING AHEAD
@8 Should the WSF continue to operate as an open space?
x
@9 Seek to reinvent itself as a collective force for political action?
x
@10 Or should attention shift to fresh initiatives for building a coherent global movement?
x