• gtiandwsf wsfdiscussion points forcomment input0

Wiki modificadas recientemente November 14, 2019 por facilitfsm

DIBCO1: Around GTI discussion on WSF  About DIBCO1 
inputs:                                   @I0- @I1 - @I2 - @I3 - @I4 - @I5 - @I6 - @I7 - @I8 - @I9 - @I10 - @I11 - @I12 - @I13 - @I14  -@I15 -@I16  
 Bases for comment-input   CxI0CxI1 -CxI2-CxI3 -CxI4 -CxI5 -CxI6 -CxI7 -CxI8 -CxI9 -CxI10 -CxI11 -CxI12 -CxI13 -CxI14 -CxI15 -CxI16

Dibco-seul-mini.png

 >> How to make a comment input :

1/ Copy paste the text below in your text processor
2/ Proceed to comment/answer the sections that you wish to comment, starting from  the "x"    
3/ Make contact with faciltating team DIBCO1  and send them your comment input


My comment-input on input#0 by Paul

 

@1 WSF has stood as a tangible expression of the diffuse but vibrant “alter globalization” community, and a source of hope for the emergence of a systemic global movement. 

x

@2 At the same time, the WSF has mirrored the movement’s immaturity.

x 

@3 More prosaically, the logistical chaos that has plagued Forums and frustrated attendees symbolizes the underdeveloped organizational capacity of the “movement of movements.” 

 

LOOKING BACK 

@ 4 What has been the historic significance of the WSF?

x 

@5 In what ways has its strategy of providing a neutral gathering space advanced (or curtailed) the “movement of movements”?

x 

 AT THE CROSSROADS

@6 Does the WSF retain its vitality as a beacon of “another world,” or is it losing momentum?

x

@7 Has its unbending commitment to radical pluralism sacrificed movement unity?

x

LOOKING AHEAD

@8 Should the WSF continue to operate as an open space?

x

@9 Seek to reinvent itself as a collective force for political action?

x 

@10 Or should attention shift to fresh initiatives for building a coherent global movement?