Re: some reflections after Com Com LG in POA.
de parte de
antonio pacor
en 02/04/2010 09:08
Dear Chico ,
is a long time that I' dont meet you, i hope you are well?
Thanks for your contribution, obrigado.
a big hug
antonio and all the focuspuller collective.
2010/4/1 <rita@...>
>
> That is an important contribution
> Thanky you, Chico
>
> []s
> Rita
>
> Citando Chico Whitaker <intercom@...>:
>
> Dear Friends, a wrote some time ago this text. I am thinking
>> perhaps it could be helpfull in our next meeting in Mexico. I hope
>> so. All the best, Chico Whitaker
>>
>> Some reflections about the Com Com questions
>>
>> Before leaving Porto Alegre, last January, I had some exchanges
>> with Jason and Monica about the meeting of the Communication
>> Commission with the Liaison Group. After that conversation I saw more
>> clearly what could explain the misunderstandings we faced.
>>
>> 1. Jason remembered in our conversation that the Com Com (and all
>> of us) always considered that the WSF communication is a
>> responsibility of all IC members.
>>
>> 2. at a moment of our meeting Jason said: if the Com Com do not
>> receive information about what is being done by the WSF participants
>> it cannot do its task.
>>
>> The combination of this two ideas push to the following reasoning:
>>
>> - the IC members are not ?communicating? as they have to do;
>>
>> - the Com Com takes then under its responsibility this task;
>>
>> - but If this Commission needs, to do this task, the information
>> sent to them by the IC members, it functions in fact as a
>> communication staff serving the IC;
>>
>> - this could explain why the Com Com members decided to work
>> ?professionally?.
>>
>> I would say then that we need to see the Com Com not as technical
>> staff but with a political role, discussing with the IC members, at
>> least the following:
>>
>> 1.- what content of communication the WSF is needing, (for instance
>> what messages we need to diffuse about the objectives of the WSF
>> process in each moment, when we say that ?another world is possible,
>> necessary and urgent?);
>>
>> 2.- what the IC members are doing or proposing (new actions and
>> campaigns, etc);
>>
>> 3.- what happened in the Forums (new actions and campaigns
>> proposed, etc);
>>
>> 4.- how the IC members can diffuse this information through the
>> means they have;
>>
>> 5.- how to articulate all this means in a cooperative way, through
>> eventually common tools and links.
>>
>> That is to say that the IC members cannot stay, in
>> the communication responsibility they have, at the very modest level
>> of sending information to a Com Com acting as ?their? communication
>> staff? And the Com Com cannot accept this task but deepen the WSF
>> communication challenge, in a political approach of it.
>>
>> I would propose to discuss this approach of the problem, instead
>> of discussing how the Com Com works now or what it is doing, as if it
>> was a technical IC ?department? to be evaluated.
>>
>> This approach could be used to all other IC Commissions, to
>> understand better their political and not technical role, to push the
>> IC to this political discussion and not to a bureaucratic one, and to
>> make all the IC members take their responsibilities in the field of
>> each Commission.
>>
>> Chico Whitaker, March 2010
>>
>> --
>> Archive: http://openfsm.net/[…]/1270128851005[1]<http://openfsm.net/%5B%E2%80%A6%5D/1270128851005%5B1%5D>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to
>> communication-commission-discussion@...[2]. Please
>> contact
>> communication-commission-discussion-manager@...[3] for
>> questions.
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1]
>> http://openfsm.net/projects/communication-commission/lists/communication-commission-discussion/archive/2010/04/1270128851005
>> [2] mailto:communication-commission-discussion@
>> lists.openfsm.net
>> [3] mailto:communication-commission-discussion-manager@
>> lists.openfsm.net
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Archive:
> http://openfsm.net/projects/communication-commission/lists/communication-commission-discussion/archive/2010/04/1270140353060
>
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to
> communication-commission-discussion@.... Please contact
> communication-commission-discussion-manager@... for
> questions.
>