-
isfextension situations table
( see first the simpler table here : ((isfextension comparing 3 situations)) (EN > AR) )
xx
A table of "communication situations", situation", caseby cases
Each line is a variant of Cases 1 2 3 4 which refer to the build up table and the registration form for outside baghdad
the column are the various communication fluxes that may coexist during an activity : central= face to face in baghdad local = face to face somewhere else - centrical/radial with the center = group in baghdad, - lateral = between groups who are outside bagdhad
A detailed form is available for iraqi organisation to announce and describe extended activities in baghdad : https://docs.google.com/forms/d/11YnTsKMPWsziR3eYohyVp9w3LPnNR6YUl_jMSkKOFo0/viewform
please note the main flux is the central or local one first column in all cases except for case 3 where the main flux is centrical/radial centrical
To be realistic the table is Assuming a ISF with 50 activities in Baghdad ( out of which 10 are enlarged 12 open to guests 13 are tele exchages ) and 30 solidarity activities abroad with 15 having a tele intervention of isf committee in them) - this is about the same as the build up table
| Central/local flux of discussion in the room in baghdad or in some place in the world | Centrical- radial flux /tools exchange between goup in baghdad activiy room and group outside baghdad | Lateral flux /tools = between groups that are outside baghdad |
Extension Preparation isf extension team tasks in green | what to do In case of low connectivity |
|
Case 1 not extended
15 activities ? see : ((isfbaghdad overview en-ar)) ((isfbaghdad overview2 en-ar)) | Main flux = Face to face activity in baghdad case 1 | no | no | none | No impact! |
|
Case 1 4A enlarged to many people
10 activities ? red area of buil dup page ((isfextension program buildup)) and ((isfabroad overview en)) | Main flux = Face to face activity in baghdad case 1 |
Tele participation 4A
Needs a camera person –with livestreaming site needs interpreter –written chat linking person with skype chat room or equivalente |
Possible and silentby written chat and side meetings 4A
Using skype or equivalent in the linking common chat room and in side meetings |
1/"Baghdad" 2/Recommended that”linking person activate the chat room before the event and camera person make some video teaserin the stream channel Support of isf extension team all 2 steps |
The streaming may be with low image definition or only audio Or it may be cancelled and replace by a chat live transcription made by the linking person and camera person The feedback chat remains the same |
|
Case 1 4B private open to one or few groups
9 activities? red area of build uppage ((isfextension program buildup)) and ((isfabroad overview en))
|
Main flux = Face to face activity in baghdad case 1
Coexisiting conn |
Tele participation 4B – coexisting independent connections
Each participation Needs a counterpart with computer in the room using skype or hangout
| Not possible |
1/"Baghdad" 2/ she will receive tele participationrequests and see to indicating counterparts among the people present in baghdad
3/Previous videoconfeence with counterpart recommended Support of isf extension team all 3 steps |
The video conference is degraded to audio– if the audio is bad orif counter part person is really motivative she can take the transcript for her guest-this transcript can be used as minutes of the activity
The interaction is through written chat |
|
Case 1 4C common open up to 10 groups
3 activities? | Main flux = Face to face activity in baghdad case 1 |
Tele participation 4B-one multipoint connection
One linking person in Baghdad using hangout but remains not priority, has to be discreetmost of the time
| Possible but discreet = no audio interference with the Baghdad room, better on written chat and side meetings |
1/“Baghdad” needs to announce openness f activity – and indicate the linking person be contacted also "abroad" can express intentions and sollicit baghdad ((isfextension contact X & Y 2/Previous videoconfeence with linking person recommended |
The video conference is degraded to audio– if the audio is bad orif counter part person is really motivative she can take the transcript for her guest-this transcript can be used as minutes of the activity
The interaction is through written chat |
|
Case 2 with a moment with someone from Baghdad
15 activities? yello area ((isfextension program buildup)) and ((isfabroad overview en))
| Main flux =Face to face activity outside bagdhad case 2 |
Short time of Tele encounterwith ISF committee Using skypeor hangout May Need interpretation | None – there are not outsiders, except if the solidarity activity is enlarged with livestreaming site and written chat |
1/“Outside bagdhad” make a request for ISF intervention has to be explicited .....((isfextension program buildup)) 2/ extension teamschedules the intervention and indicates a personin isf comittee– 3/previous video contact recommended 4/ isf team support during isf event | The moment of video conference is degraded to audio or written chat |
|
Case 2 without intervention from baghdad
15 activities ? | Main flux =Face to face activity outside bagdhad case 2 | no | no | Nothing to do | No impact |
|
Case 3A 2 points
10 activities? green area ((isfextension program buildup)) and ((isfabroad overview en)) | Face to face comments or the main flux which is centrical |
Main flux =Bi point Tele encounteractivity with Baghdad case 3 Needs skype or hangout Needs interpretation Use audio+ wirtten | None – there are no outsiders, except if the tele encounter activity is enlarged from one of the two point |
1/ one side propose tele encounter and extension team publishes in build up page ((isfextension program buildup)) 2/ other side confirm interestand extension team puts in contact 3/ preliminary skype contacts and tests with support ofisf team in baghda ((isfextension contact X & Y)) | The moment of video conference is degraded to audio or written chat |
|
Case 3B multipoints
3 activities? | Face to face comments or the main flux which is circular |
Main flux = Multipoint Tele encounteractivity with Baghdad case 3 Needs skype or hangoutvideo/audio/written | None –there are no outsiders, except if the tele encounter activity is enlarged filming the screen ? | Can be an evolution of above if agreement between the first two counterparts and more comingor is porposed upfront by baghdad with support ofisf team in baghda | The moment of video conference is degraded to audio or written chat |
What is the flux of communication in the various cases ?
- During ISF the flux of extended communication is mostly “centrical/radial ”
“centrical”– people want to interact with Baghdadand only secondarily “lateral” with other people like them who are not in baghdad - Also in tele encounter case 3 "Baghdad" and "out of bagadhad"
Baghdad and out of bagadhadhave the same priority for talking –there is symmetrical–there isinteraction all the time of the activity - while incase 2 and case 4 this will be only for a short moment ( eg 10mn of intervention from Baghdad in a solidarity activity ,or 10mn of intervention of an outside baghad group in a Baghdad activity , or not at all - While in tele participation case 4 the “central flux “inside” the Baghdad activity room is most of the time more important than the “centrical/radial
“centricalflux” eg interaction between out of Baghdad and Baghdad room - The case of a multi point with more than two places having equal priority of speechis not so frequent
xxx