-
cifuturG2 consultation inputs1
last modified September 27, 2013 by facilitfsm
5 alternatives in form form item list first explorations faq about form form overview
survey menu WSF & IC in english - menu exploraciones FSM & CI en espanol - menu explorations FSM & CI en francais
This is a series of inputs- subsumed as "inputs 1" though provoking in answers proposed in exploration 3 survey - work in progress
5 ideas are summarized in a diagram between existing and possible IC see here: http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-input1-alternatives
1/ Consider "DUAL MEMBERSHIP", to include "independents" persons ( eg 2011 movement activists) presented by member organisations
2/ Consider replacing "liaison group" by several "STRUCTURAL GROUPS", each with a limited scope, to spread collective ownership of CI/IC operation among all WSF IC/CI members ( MEMBERSHIP- AGENDA – EVALUATION – RESOURCES – EXTENSION - CONTRIBUTION REVIEW – FOLLOW UP)
3/ Consider replacing "commissions" by more "FUNCTIONAL REVIEW GROUPS" ( more because several groups are porposed on the communication scope), each focusing on updating a working plan entrusted to contributive groups (see point 5) EXPANSION STRATEGY RESOURCES METHODOLOGY CONTENT ORGANIZERS EXPERIENCE PARTICIPANT EXPERIENCE MEDIA EXPERIENCE NON PARTICIPANTS OUTREACH )
4/ Consider instituting a public peer to peer "WSF CONTRIBUTION REVIEW among IC/CI members", and give more IC/CI meeting time to value concrete contributive work
5/ Consider implementig the various functional working plans mentioned in 3/, through "CONTRIBUTION GROUPS", which are open also to sf event organizers and active wsf participants, in order to allow outreach and inmersion of IC/CI in a wider community ( more info http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-possible-working-groups-to-care-about-wsf-process)
mexico 2010
The version 1 and 2 of consultation reads more like " do you want ic to go on as before , yes? , or if not what do you propose? " it is worth proposing a V3form with multiple answers illustrating alternatives
index of pages in inputs 1 ( also visible as links in the top of each page)
DOCUMENTING ALTERNATIVE IDEAS ABOUT IC/CI- exploration 3 form
- cifuturG2 inputs1 challenges what are the challenges fhat we need to face this links to the following pages
-
cifuturG2 describing wsf process
what is the formal area of wsf process ? what does caring about wsf process mean? this feeds the Question 1 and 2
- Q1 - WSF IC/CIBODY SCOPE OF ACTION.. 4
- Q2 - SELF DEFINED MISSIONS OF WSF IC/CIBODY related to WSF process. 4
- cifuturG2 wsf process caring body elements some elements on " how to work together in a wsf process caring body " this feeds in the complement questions mostly ( in blue tables) http://openfsm.net/projects/cifutur/cifuturg2-form-input1-complements
- cifuturG2 possible working groups to care about wsf process what scope of activity when caring about wsf process - past present and possible working groups - this feeds question 10
- cifuturG2 about contribution profile how to explore what has been /could be done by each organisation caring about the process and not just participating to it - this feeds in question 11
- cifuturG2 about dualmembership how to mix representatives and individuals, how to include new energies /movements this feeds question 6 and 9
- cifuturG2 body meeting typical agenda how to organize the agenda of meeting this feeds questions 12 13 14
- stuctural and functionnal groups which can be groups with limited scope sharing the tasks of holding the community/initiative together this feeds in question 10
- cifuturG2 input1 political considerations
- cifiturG2 input1 scale considerations
- ((cifuturG2 input1 existing & possible))
-
cifuturG2 input1 alternatives
EXPLORATION FORMS